From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from tim.rpsys.net (93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk [93.97.173.237]) by mx1.pokylinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C6944C80815 for ; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 02:31:13 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oAC8VD9k002696; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 08:31:13 GMT Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 02360-06; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 08:31:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oAC8UwVm002689 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 12 Nov 2010 08:31:02 GMT From: Richard Purdie To: Gary Thomas In-Reply-To: <4CDCF848.9020703@mlbassoc.com> References: <4CDB2A52.6060400@mlbassoc.com> <1289539963.1272.3055.camel@rex> <4CDCF848.9020703@mlbassoc.com> Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 16:30:56 +0800 Message-ID: <1289550656.1272.3179.camel@rex> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: Poky Subject: Re: SSTATE builds more broken than I thought X-BeenThere: poky@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Poky build system developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 08:31:14 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 01:18 -0700, Gary Thomas wrote: > > Are these all files or are they symlinks? Are they just present for > > deploy-ipk or are there others? > > They are files. > > Sorry, but I don't understand your other question. These are the only > extra files polluting the tree, except for Python *.py? object files > which are also always created. Are there any files related to other sstate tasks such as populate-sysroot*.tgz or package*.tgz or is there just *deploy-ipk*.tgz? In other words I'm wondering if this is something specific to the deploy-ipk sstate task... Cheers, Richard