From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Philippe Gerum In-Reply-To: References: <1289813422.1933.79.camel@domain.hid> <4CE13133.4070006@domain.hid> <1289833622.1933.128.camel@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 21:56:21 +0100 Message-ID: <1289854581.1933.205.camel@domain.hid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] Debug/trace tools for xenomai applications. List-Id: Help regarding installation and common use of Xenomai List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: ronny meeus Cc: Xenomai-help@domain.hid On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 21:26 +0100, ronny meeus wrote: > Hello > > Thanks for the information. > I was testing on QEMU but I have seen that there are issue with the > timing anyhow. > I'm currently changing to a target environment. Once this is > completed, I will re-run my tests and get back with the result. > > I do not really understand what you mean with the simulator. > Where can I find more information about it? http://git.xenomai.org/?p=xenosim.git;a=blob;f=doc/mvm-manual.txt;h=1c6767ea2890d68e1c1c5cfe1420e189b3cc5328;hb=06919eb3a6b6baf7880ea3ade1ecc5f610c35794 > > Thanks > Ronny > > On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 4:07 PM, Philippe Gerum > wrote: > On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 14:10 +0100, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > > Philippe Gerum wrote: > > > If you want to validate the pSOS emulation core, the best > tool is the > > > simulator. Unfortunately, this tools still requires to be > built with an > > > antiquated C++ toolchain, so the only sane way to enable > it nowadays is > > > via qemu. You would need ~2 hours to set this up. > > > > > > If you want to try this, I can help. Otherwise, other > suggestions you > > > already got on this list will do. > > > > Maybe we should put a page on the wiki on how to use the > simulator? > > > > > The problem is that we have no bandwidth to maintain it > properly, this > is a project in itself; so this should be clearly stated on > such > documentation. The gcc-based (2.95.x) instrumenter is 12-years > old now, > and rewriting this part would a very significant work. It's > really a > pity, since the simulator is definitely the ultimate tool for > finding > functional bugs in emulators. Oh, well. > > -- > Philippe. > > > -- Philippe.