From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from tim.rpsys.net (93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk [93.97.173.237]) by mx1.pokylinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FCFA4C80BD4 for ; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 06:18:50 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oAJCIomB014369; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 12:18:50 GMT Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 14210-04; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 12:18:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oAJCIioV014363 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 19 Nov 2010 12:18:44 GMT From: Richard Purdie To: Chris Larson In-Reply-To: References: <20101119035102.GA31016@qhe2-db> Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 12:18:30 +0000 Message-ID: <1290169110.1272.12266.camel@rex> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: poky@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] bitbake: add task tracking X-BeenThere: poky@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Poky build system developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 12:18:51 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 21:13 -0700, Chris Larson wrote: > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 8:51 PM, Qing He wrote: > Add a new option to record start and end time of every task > > Signed-off-by: Qing He > > > This is useful conceptually, and I'm glad to see others touching the > bitbake code, so kudos on that, but implementation wise, I have > concerns. For one, this doesn't need to be in bitbake at all, it's > quite easily implemented in the metadata using an event handler and > the task events. For two, hardcoding the log file and format seems > unwise. I agree, implementing this as an event handler would be a better approach and allow more flexibility. Qing: I thought we'd already discussed that? Cheers, Richard