From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from pug.o-hand.com (3a.49.1343.static.theplanet.com [67.19.73.58]) by mx1.pokylinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E453C4C80B6B for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 11:23:11 -0600 (CST) Received: from [10.250.128.97] (unknown [158.43.2.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pug.o-hand.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 492F912EC1C5 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 12:00:31 -0600 (CST) From: Joshua Lock To: poky@yoctoproject.org In-Reply-To: <4CE6A7FF.4040507@windriver.com> References: <00ec71b3834779b9c4a278b403729f2822a41845.1290179273.git.josh@linux.intel.com> <4CE6A7FF.4040507@windriver.com> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 17:22:56 +0000 Message-ID: <1290532976.9539.16.camel@scimitar> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 (2.32.1-1.fc14) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] poky.conf: move the SDK install into versiondirectories X-BeenThere: poky@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Poky build system developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 17:23:12 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 10:38 -0600, Mark Hatle wrote: > As we move beyond 1.0 work. Would it make sense to focus on making sure the SDK > tooling works no matter where it is installed? It sure would. Theoretically that's already the case we just default to extracting the SDK to a sane place. Are you suggesting that we just inflate to a child of cwd and do the leg work to ensure this *should* work? Cheers, Joshua -- Joshua Lock Intel Open Source Technology Centre