From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vasiliy G Tolstov Subject: Re: any plans to sopport virtio-serial ? Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 15:57:18 +0300 Message-ID: <1290603438.2890.22.camel@vase> References: <1290499219.17994.119.camel@vase> <1290522577.2890.0.camel@vase> <1290526418.2890.3.camel@vase> Reply-To: v.tolstov@selfip.ru Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Stefano Stabellini Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 12:55 +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Tue, 23 Nov 2010, Vasiliy G Tolstov wrote: > > Stefano, is there this branch tested for live migration issues? For > > example, if i compile kernel with config, that working on > > stable-2.6.32.x does it work on pvhvm branch? > > PV on HVM should work on stable-2.6.32.x but I received a bug > report on live migration issues precisely on that kernel, so if it > doesn't work for you I wouldn't be surprised. > > Alternatively I suggest you keep using 2.6.36-rc6-pvhvm-v8. > Ok. I'm try to use pvhvm and deeper testing it. Does pvhvm branch pull changes from stable-2.6.32.x ? -- Vasiliy G Tolstov Selfip.Ru