From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [thiscpuops upgrade 10/10] Lockless (and preemptless) fastpaths for slub
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 18:26:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1290619610.2072.500.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1011241013240.14268@router.home>
On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 10:14 -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > This thing still relies on disabling IRQs in the slow path, which means
> > its still going to be a lot of work to make it work on -rt.
>
> The disabling of irqs is because slab operations are used from interrupt
> context. If we can avoid slab operations from interrupt contexts then we
> can drop the interrupt disable in the slab allocators.
That's not so much the point, there's per-cpu assumptions due to that.
Not everything is under a proper lock, see for example this bit:
new = new_slab(s, gfpflags, node);
if (gfpflags & __GFP_WAIT)
local_irq_disable();
if (new) {
c = __this_cpu_ptr(s->cpu_slab);
stat(s, ALLOC_SLAB);
if (c->page)
flush_slab(s, c);
slab_lock(new);
__SetPageSlubFrozen(new);
c->page = new;
goto load_freelist;
}
There we have the __this_cpu_ptr, c->page deref and flush_slab()->stat()
call all before we take a lock.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-24 17:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-23 23:51 [thiscpuops upgrade 00/10] Upgrade of this_cpu_ops Christoph Lameter
2010-11-23 23:51 ` [thiscpuops upgrade 01/10] percpucounter: Optimize __percpu_counter_add a bit through the use of this_cpu() options Christoph Lameter
2010-11-24 7:07 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-11-26 15:43 ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-23 23:51 ` [thiscpuops upgrade 02/10] vmstat: Optimize zone counter modifications through the use of this cpu operations Christoph Lameter
2010-11-26 16:25 ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-23 23:51 ` [thiscpuops upgrade 03/10] percpu: Generic support for this_cpu_add,sub,dec,inc_return Christoph Lameter
2010-11-26 16:31 ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-26 16:37 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-11-26 16:39 ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-23 23:51 ` [thiscpuops upgrade 04/10] x86: Support " Christoph Lameter
2010-11-26 16:33 ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-23 23:51 ` [thiscpuops upgrade 05/10] x86: Use this_cpu_inc_return for nmi counter Christoph Lameter
2010-11-26 16:35 ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-26 17:02 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-11-26 17:05 ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-23 23:51 ` [thiscpuops upgrade 06/10] vmstat: Use this_cpu_inc_return for vm statistics Christoph Lameter
2010-11-23 23:51 ` [thiscpuops upgrade 07/10] highmem: Use this_cpu_xx_return() operations Christoph Lameter
2010-11-23 23:51 ` [thiscpuops upgrade 08/10] percpu: generic this_cpu_cmpxchg() and this_cpu_cmpxchg_double support Christoph Lameter
2010-11-26 16:51 ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-26 16:56 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-26 16:58 ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-26 17:01 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-26 17:07 ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-26 17:16 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-23 23:51 ` [thiscpuops upgrade 09/10] x86: this_cpu_cmpxchg and this_cpu_cmpxchg_double operations Christoph Lameter
2010-11-24 0:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-24 3:11 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-11-24 7:05 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-11-24 0:44 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-11-23 23:51 ` [thiscpuops upgrade 10/10] Lockless (and preemptless) fastpaths for slub Christoph Lameter
2010-11-24 0:22 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-11-24 3:13 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-11-24 4:37 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-11-24 1:02 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-11-24 1:05 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-11-24 3:09 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-11-24 7:16 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-11-24 16:17 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-11-24 16:37 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-11-24 16:45 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-11-24 16:47 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-11-24 16:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-11-24 19:37 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-11-24 19:53 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-11-24 20:01 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2010-11-24 19:56 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-11-24 8:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-24 16:14 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-11-24 17:26 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-11-24 18:08 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1290619610.2072.500.camel@laptop \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.