From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: roland@redhat.com, oleg@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
"rjw@sisk.plpavel"@ucw.cz
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 11/14] ptrace: make group stop notification reliable against ptrace
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 11:49:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1290768569-16224-12-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1290768569-16224-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
Group stop notifications are unreliable if one or more tasks of the
task group are being ptraced. If a ptraced task ends up finishing a
group stop, the notification is sent to the ptracer and the real
parent never gets notified.
This patch adds a new signal flag SIGNAL_NOTIFY_STOP which is set on
group stop completion and cleared after notification to the real
parent or together with other stopped flags on SIGCONT/KILL. This
guarantees that the real parent is notified correctly regardless of
ptrace. If a ptraced task is the last task to stop, the notification
is postponed till ptrace detach or canceled if SIGCONT/KILL is
received inbetween.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 2 ++
kernel/signal.c | 20 +++++++++++++-------
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index e78b1e5..3e40761 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -653,6 +653,8 @@ struct signal_struct {
#define SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE 0x00000040 /* for init: ignore fatal signals */
+#define SIGNAL_NOTIFY_STOP 0x00000100 /* notify parent of group stop */
+
/* If true, all threads except ->group_exit_task have pending SIGKILL */
static inline int signal_group_exit(const struct signal_struct *sig)
{
diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
index c084ea8..f2da456 100644
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -1739,7 +1739,6 @@ void ptrace_notify(int exit_code)
static int do_signal_stop(int signr)
{
struct signal_struct *sig = current->signal;
- int notify = 0;
if (!(current->group_stop & GROUP_STOP_PENDING)) {
unsigned int gstop = GROUP_STOP_PENDING | GROUP_STOP_CONSUME;
@@ -1780,8 +1779,9 @@ static int do_signal_stop(int signr)
*/
if (sig->group_stop_count == 1 &&
(current->group_stop & GROUP_STOP_CONSUME))
- notify = CLD_STOPPED;
- notify = tracehook_notify_jctl(notify, CLD_STOPPED);
+ tracehook_notify_jctl(CLD_STOPPED, CLD_STOPPED);
+ else
+ tracehook_notify_jctl(0, CLD_STOPPED);
/*
* tracehook_notify_jctl() can drop and reacquire siglock, so
* we test GROUP_STOP_PENDING again. If SIGCONT or SIGKILL
@@ -1791,20 +1791,26 @@ static int do_signal_stop(int signr)
goto out_unlock;
if (consume_group_stop())
- sig->flags = SIGNAL_STOP_STOPPED;
+ sig->flags = SIGNAL_STOP_STOPPED | SIGNAL_NOTIFY_STOP;
retry:
current->exit_code = sig->group_exit_code;
current->group_stop &= ~GROUP_STOP_PENDING;
__set_current_state(TASK_STOPPED);
if (likely(!task_ptrace(current))) {
+ bool do_notify = false;
+
+ if (sig->flags & SIGNAL_NOTIFY_STOP) {
+ sig->flags &= ~SIGNAL_NOTIFY_STOP;
+ do_notify = true;
+ }
+
spin_unlock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
- if (notify) {
+ if (do_notify) {
read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
- do_notify_parent_cldstop(current, notify);
+ do_notify_parent_cldstop(current, CLD_STOPPED);
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
- notify = 0;
}
/* Now we don't run again until woken by SIGCONT or SIGKILL */
--
1.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-26 10:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-26 10:49 [PATCHSET RFC] ptrace,signal: sane interaction between ptrace and job control signals Tejun Heo
2010-11-26 10:49 ` [PATCH 01/14] signal: fix SIGCONT notification code Tejun Heo
2010-11-26 13:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-12-01 1:43 ` Roland McGrath
2010-11-26 10:49 ` [PATCH 02/14] freezer: fix a race during freezing of TASK_STOPPED tasks Tejun Heo
2010-11-26 19:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-11-26 19:59 ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-26 10:49 ` [PATCH 03/14] freezer: remove superflous try_to_freeze() loop in do_signal_stop() Tejun Heo
2010-11-26 19:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-11-26 10:49 ` [PATCH 04/14] signal: don't notify parent if not stopping after tracehook_notify_jctl() " Tejun Heo
2010-11-26 14:46 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-11-26 15:04 ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-26 10:49 ` [PATCH 05/14] signal: fix premature completion of group stop when interfered by ptrace Tejun Heo
2010-11-26 15:40 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-11-26 16:03 ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-26 10:49 ` [PATCH 06/14] signal: use GROUP_STOP_PENDING to avoid stopping multiple times for a single group stop Tejun Heo
2010-11-26 17:59 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-11-26 18:39 ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-27 11:40 ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2010-11-28 19:07 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-11-29 13:38 ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-26 10:49 ` [PATCH 07/14] ptrace: add @why to ptrace_stop() Tejun Heo
2010-11-26 10:49 ` [PATCH 08/14] ptrace: make do_signal_stop() use ptrace_stop() if the task is being ptraced Tejun Heo
2010-11-28 19:54 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-11-28 20:22 ` Jan Kratochvil
2010-11-28 20:53 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-11-26 10:49 ` [PATCH 09/14] ptrace: clean transitions between TASK_STOPPED and TRACED Tejun Heo
2010-11-28 20:25 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-11-28 20:51 ` Jan Kratochvil
2010-11-29 13:48 ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-26 10:49 ` [PATCH 10/14] ptrace: don't consume group count from ptrace_stop() Tejun Heo
2010-11-26 10:49 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2010-11-28 20:30 ` [PATCH 11/14] ptrace: make group stop notification reliable against ptrace Oleg Nesterov
2010-11-29 13:52 ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-26 10:49 ` [PATCH 12/14] ptrace: reorganize __ptrace_unlink() and ptrace_untrace() Tejun Heo
2010-11-26 10:49 ` [PATCH 13/14] ptrace: make SIGCONT notification reliable against ptrace Tejun Heo
2010-11-26 10:49 ` [PATCH 14/14] ptrace: remove the extra wake_up_process() from ptrace_detach() Tejun Heo
2010-11-28 20:44 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-11-29 13:55 ` Tejun Heo
2010-11-26 10:55 ` [PATCHSET RFC] ptrace,signal: sane interaction between ptrace and job control signals Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1290768569-16224-12-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc="rjw@sisk.plpavel"@ucw.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.