From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from tim.rpsys.net (93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk [93.97.173.237]) by mx1.pokylinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4C1D4C80039 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 15:19:27 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oASLJQRC021031; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 21:19:26 GMT Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 20784-04; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 21:19:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oASLJF37021024 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 28 Nov 2010 21:19:18 GMT From: Richard Purdie To: Gary Thomas In-Reply-To: <4CE408E8.2030102@mlbassoc.com> References: <4CE408E8.2030102@mlbassoc.com> Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 12:13:40 +0000 Message-ID: <1290946420.27143.49.camel@rex> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: Poky Subject: Re: Noexec tasks? X-BeenThere: poky@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Poky build system developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 21:19:29 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 09:55 -0700, Gary Thomas wrote: > Messages like these are [fairly] new: > NOTE: Noexec task 3045 of 3117 (ID: 505, /local/poky-amltd/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross_4.5.0.bb, do_package_write) > I don't see that they add much (any?) value and just increase the > noise. For example, if I rerun 'bitbake some-image' which has N > steps, I get N-2 of these followed by a couple of steps that actually > do the work. Pretty annoying when N is large (for most images, N is > measured in thousands of steps) > > Can these messages be suppressed? Is there any good reason to show them? They're meant to appear once, the first time a noexec task is "skipped" in the same way the other running task X of Y messages appear. I found the bug that was causing the to repeat all the time and will push a fix which should make the messages much less annoying :). Cheers, Richard