From: Michele Bonera <mbonera@gmail.com>
To: Jan Ceuleers <jan.ceuleers@computer.org>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Problems after reshaping of Raid5 array
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 21:04:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1291061079.5909.84.camel@bellatrix.morrisoft.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CF3FB20.2040100@computer.org>
Il giorno lun, 29/11/2010 alle 20.12 +0100, Jan Ceuleers ha scritto:
> I've had similar problems, which I resolved by changing the partition
> type from fd (Linux RAID autodetect) to 83 (Linux), ensuring that the
> initrd is able to assemble the RAID.
> Worth a shot.
> HTH, Jan
Thanks for the reply, Jan, but the problem is not at raid level, or
better, the raid just finished to reshape and now has 5/5 of his
components and is active:
root@mizar:~# cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] [linear] [multipath] [raid0]
[raid1] [raid10]
md6 : active raid5 sdf1[2] sdb1[0] sda1[1] sdc[4] sde1[3]
3438905344 blocks level 5, 128k chunk, algorithm 2 [5/5] [UUUUU]
The problem is that I added a device partition (sdc1) but after the
crash the array has sdc (the device) as one of his components. The
partition table on the disk was wiped-out.
The result is that the filesystem on it (dev/md6) is unreadable and
fsck.ext3 can't fix it.
Bye
--
Michele Bonera
linux user group brescia
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-29 20:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-29 17:24 Problems after reshaping of Raid5 array Michele Bonera
2010-11-29 19:12 ` Jan Ceuleers
2010-11-29 20:04 ` Michele Bonera [this message]
2010-11-30 17:00 ` Jan Ceuleers
2010-11-29 21:45 ` Neil Brown
2010-11-30 7:23 ` Michele Bonera
2010-11-30 19:45 ` Jan Ceuleers
2010-12-03 7:03 ` Michele Bonera
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1291061079.5909.84.camel@bellatrix.morrisoft.local \
--to=mbonera@gmail.com \
--cc=jan.ceuleers@computer.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.