From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 07/11] ARM: hw_breakpoint: unify single-stepping code for watchpoints and breakpoints
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 13:45:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1291297562-8052-8-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1291297562-8052-1-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com>
The single-stepping code is currently different depending on whether
we are stepping over a breakpoint or a watchpoint. There is no good
reason for this, so let's sort it out.
This patch adds functions for enabling/disabling single-step for
a particular hw_breakpoint and integrates this with the exception
handling code.
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
---
arch/arm/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h | 4 +-
arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++-----------------
2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
index 881429d..f389b27 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
@@ -20,8 +20,8 @@ struct arch_hw_breakpoint_ctrl {
struct arch_hw_breakpoint {
u32 address;
u32 trigger;
- struct arch_hw_breakpoint_ctrl step_ctrl;
- struct arch_hw_breakpoint_ctrl ctrl;
+ struct arch_hw_breakpoint_ctrl step_ctrl;
+ struct arch_hw_breakpoint_ctrl ctrl;
};
static inline u32 encode_ctrl_reg(struct arch_hw_breakpoint_ctrl ctrl)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c b/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
index 81b63e9..36cd768 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
@@ -339,6 +339,11 @@ int arch_install_hw_breakpoint(struct perf_event *bp)
val_base = ARM_BASE_BVR;
slots = __get_cpu_var(bp_on_reg);
max_slots = core_num_brps;
+ if (info->step_ctrl.enabled) {
+ /* Override the breakpoint data with the step data. */
+ addr = info->trigger & ~0x3;
+ ctrl = encode_ctrl_reg(info->step_ctrl);
+ }
} else {
/* Watchpoint */
if (info->step_ctrl.enabled) {
@@ -628,21 +633,28 @@ out:
return ret;
}
-static void update_mismatch_flag(int idx, int flag)
+/*
+ * Enable/disable single-stepping over the breakpoint bp at address addr.
+ */
+static void enable_single_step(struct perf_event *bp, u32 addr)
{
- struct perf_event *bp = __get_cpu_var(bp_on_reg[idx]);
- struct arch_hw_breakpoint *info;
-
- if (bp == NULL)
- return;
+ struct arch_hw_breakpoint *info = counter_arch_bp(bp);
- info = counter_arch_bp(bp);
+ arch_uninstall_hw_breakpoint(bp);
+ info->step_ctrl.mismatch = 1;
+ info->step_ctrl.len = ARM_BREAKPOINT_LEN_4;
+ info->step_ctrl.type = ARM_BREAKPOINT_EXECUTE;
+ info->step_ctrl.privilege = info->ctrl.privilege;
+ info->step_ctrl.enabled = 1;
+ info->trigger = addr;
+ arch_install_hw_breakpoint(bp);
+}
- /* Update the mismatch field to enter/exit `single-step' mode */
- if (!bp->overflow_handler && info->ctrl.mismatch != flag) {
- info->ctrl.mismatch = flag;
- write_wb_reg(ARM_BASE_BCR + idx, encode_ctrl_reg(info->ctrl) | 0x1);
- }
+static void disable_single_step(struct perf_event *bp)
+{
+ arch_uninstall_hw_breakpoint(bp);
+ counter_arch_bp(bp)->step_ctrl.enabled = 0;
+ arch_install_hw_breakpoint(bp);
}
static void watchpoint_handler(unsigned long unknown, struct pt_regs *regs)
@@ -679,16 +691,8 @@ static void watchpoint_handler(unsigned long unknown, struct pt_regs *regs)
* mismatch breakpoint so we can single-step over the
* watchpoint trigger.
*/
- if (!wp->overflow_handler) {
- arch_uninstall_hw_breakpoint(wp);
- info->step_ctrl.mismatch = 1;
- info->step_ctrl.len = ARM_BREAKPOINT_LEN_4;
- info->step_ctrl.type = ARM_BREAKPOINT_EXECUTE;
- info->step_ctrl.privilege = info->ctrl.privilege;
- info->step_ctrl.enabled = 1;
- info->trigger = regs->ARM_pc;
- arch_install_hw_breakpoint(wp);
- }
+ if (!wp->overflow_handler)
+ enable_single_step(wp, instruction_pointer(regs));
rcu_read_unlock();
}
@@ -716,11 +720,8 @@ static void watchpoint_single_step_handler(unsigned long pc)
* Restore the original watchpoint if we've completed the
* single-step.
*/
- if (info->trigger != pc) {
- arch_uninstall_hw_breakpoint(wp);
- info->step_ctrl.enabled = 0;
- arch_install_hw_breakpoint(wp);
- }
+ if (info->trigger != pc)
+ disable_single_step(wp);
unlock:
rcu_read_unlock();
@@ -730,7 +731,6 @@ unlock:
static void breakpoint_handler(unsigned long unknown, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
int i;
- int mismatch;
u32 ctrl_reg, val, addr;
struct perf_event *bp, **slots = __get_cpu_var(bp_on_reg);
struct arch_hw_breakpoint *info;
@@ -745,34 +745,33 @@ static void breakpoint_handler(unsigned long unknown, struct pt_regs *regs)
bp = slots[i];
- if (bp == NULL) {
- rcu_read_unlock();
- continue;
- }
+ if (bp == NULL)
+ goto unlock;
- mismatch = 0;
+ info = counter_arch_bp(bp);
/* Check if the breakpoint value matches. */
val = read_wb_reg(ARM_BASE_BVR + i);
if (val != (addr & ~0x3))
- goto unlock;
+ goto mismatch;
/* Possible match, check the byte address select to confirm. */
ctrl_reg = read_wb_reg(ARM_BASE_BCR + i);
decode_ctrl_reg(ctrl_reg, &ctrl);
if ((1 << (addr & 0x3)) & ctrl.len) {
- mismatch = 1;
- info = counter_arch_bp(bp);
info->trigger = addr;
- }
-
-unlock:
- if (mismatch && !info->ctrl.mismatch) {
pr_debug("breakpoint fired: address = 0x%x\n", addr);
perf_bp_event(bp, regs);
+ if (!bp->overflow_handler)
+ enable_single_step(bp, addr);
+ goto unlock;
}
- update_mismatch_flag(i, mismatch);
+mismatch:
+ /* If we're stepping a breakpoint, it can now be restored. */
+ if (info->step_ctrl.enabled)
+ disable_single_step(bp);
+unlock:
rcu_read_unlock();
}
--
1.7.0.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-02 13:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-02 13:45 [PATCH 00/11] ARM: hw_breakpoint: fixes and improvements (v3) Will Deacon
2010-12-02 13:45 ` [PATCH 01/11] ARM: hw_breakpoint: ensure OS lock is clear before writing to debug registers Will Deacon
2010-12-02 13:45 ` [PATCH 02/11] ARM: hw_breakpoint: reset control registers in hotplug path Will Deacon
2010-12-02 13:45 ` [PATCH 03/11] ARM: hw_breakpoint: correct and simplify alignment fixup code Will Deacon
2010-12-02 13:45 ` [PATCH 04/11] ARM: hw_breakpoint: disable preemption during debug exception handling Will Deacon
2010-12-02 13:45 ` [PATCH 05/11] ARM: hw_breakpoint: don't advertise reserved breakpoints Will Deacon
2010-12-02 13:45 ` [PATCH 06/11] ARM: hw_breakpoint: do not allocate new breakpoints with preemption disabled Will Deacon
2010-12-02 13:45 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2010-12-02 13:45 ` [PATCH 08/11] ARM: hw_breakpoint: disallow per-cpu breakpoints without overflow handler Will Deacon
2010-12-02 13:46 ` [PATCH 09/11] ARM: ptrace: fix style issue with hw_breakpoint interface Will Deacon
2010-12-02 13:46 ` [PATCH 10/11] ARM: hw_breakpoint: fix warnings generated by sparse Will Deacon
2010-12-02 14:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-12-02 14:33 ` Will Deacon
2010-12-02 13:46 ` [PATCH 11/11] ARM: hw_breakpoint: do not fail initcall if monitor mode is disabled Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1291297562-8052-8-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.