From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Skeggs Subject: Re: [00/66] 2.6.36.1-stable review Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:17:20 +1000 Message-ID: <1291785443.12581.14.camel@nisroch> References: <20101119220309.GA15562@kroah.com> <4CE7DA05.8050605@mit.edu> <20101120155251.GB28803@suse.de> Reply-To: bskeggs@redhat.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E19999EB32 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 21:18:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dri-devel-bounces+sf-dri-devel=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces+sf-dri-devel=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Andrew Lutomirski Cc: stable@kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org On Sat, 2010-11-20 at 11:15 -0500, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Greg KH wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 09:24:05AM -0500, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > >> Greg KH wrote: > >>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 2.6.36.1 release. > >>> There are 66 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > >>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > >>> let us know. If anyone is a maintainer of the proper subsystem, and > >>> wants to add a Signed-off-by: line to the patch, please respond with it. > >> > >> Can you add ab838338a2a9e0cb8346eb0cab9977be13e8dce5? (Somehow the cc: > >> stable got eaten, but 2.6.36 definitely needs this one. 2.6.35 probably > >> does as well but I haven't tested it.) > > > > Please get an ack from the maintainer of that driver and the drm > > maintainer so that I can apply it to the next .36 queue. Acked-by: Ben Skeggs > > > > Can you ack this for 2.6.36, please? > > I suspect that 2.6.35 needs it as well, but I won't be able to test on > my NV50 machine for two weeks (I'll be out of town, and I don't have > fancy enough remote control over that box to boot suspected-bad > kernels remotely). > > --Andy