From: Ian Kent <ikent@redhat.com>
To: Ondrej Valousek <webserv@s3group.cz>
Cc: "autofs@linux.kernel.org" <autofs@linux.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: NFSv4 to be a default on RHEL-6
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 21:45:50 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1291815950.17231.26.camel@perseus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CFF7F35.9070506@s3group.cz>
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 13:51 +0100, Ondrej Valousek wrote:
> On 08.12.2010 13:36, Ian Kent wrote:
> > The default should be determined by mount.nfs(8) since that's what
> > autofs uses to perform mounts.
> I see, but it works only if the nfs4 root export is the same as /. It
> does not work otherwise. Example:
> Server 'dorado' exporting directory /exports which is also fsid=0 for
> nfs4.
> There is (also shared) subdirectory 'ext1' in this one. When I do:
>
> cd /net/dorado/exports/ext1
>
> ... the export is mounted using NFSv3. Theoretically if I did:
>
> cd /net/dorado/ext1
>
> ... I should have the same mounted via NFSv4, right? Unfortunately it
> does not work. But it should because:
>
> mount dorado:/ext1 /mnt
>
> works (giving nfs4 mount)....
The only information the hosts map has to go on is the export list
received from the server.
There is no way for autofs to know that /exports is the global root from
the mountd exports information. It only knows that /exports is an export
and neither does it know what NFS version the server may offer for this
mount. That information just isn't available.
As I said, I thought in recent Fedora releases (not sure now when this
should have happened), that
mount <server>:/exports /<some mount point>
and
mount <server>:/ /<some mount point>
should both work and mount as NFSv4. Correct me if I'm wrong but your
point is that it is mounting as NFSv3 so perhaps we should log a bug and
see what the experts have to say on this.
Ian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-08 13:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-08 9:16 NFSv4 to be a default on RHEL-6 Ondrej Valousek
2010-12-08 12:36 ` Ian Kent
2010-12-08 12:51 ` Ondrej Valousek
2010-12-08 13:45 ` Ian Kent [this message]
2010-12-08 14:56 ` Ondrej Valousek
2010-12-09 1:45 ` Ian Kent
2010-12-09 12:51 ` Steve Dickson
2010-12-09 14:51 ` Ian Kent
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1291815950.17231.26.camel@perseus \
--to=ikent@redhat.com \
--cc=autofs@linux.kernel.org \
--cc=webserv@s3group.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.