All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Haren Myneni <hbabu@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: perf hw  in kexeced kernel broken in tip
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:33:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1291818811.28378.45.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101208140103.GM21786@redhat.com>

On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 09:01 -0500, Don Zickus wrote:
> Privately, I used the above wrapped with for_each_online_cpu(cpu) and it
> worked fine for me. 


Something like so then?

---
Subject: perf: Stop all counters on reboot
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Date: Wed Dec 08 15:29:02 CET 2010

Use the reboot notifier to detach all running counters on reboot, this
solves a problem with kexec where the new kernel doesn't expect
running counters (rightly so).

It will however decrease the coverage of the NMI watchdog. Making a
kexec specific reboot notifier callback would be best, however that
would require touching all notifier callback handlers as they are not
properly structured to deal with new state.

As a compromise, place the perf reboot notifier at the very last
position in the list.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/perf_event.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
 #include <linux/dcache.h>
 #include <linux/percpu.h>
 #include <linux/ptrace.h>
+#include <linux/reboot.h>
 #include <linux/vmstat.h>
 #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
 #include <linux/hardirq.h>
@@ -6329,7 +6330,7 @@ static void __cpuinit perf_event_init_cp
 	mutex_unlock(&swhash->hlist_mutex);
 }
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
+#if defined CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU || defined CONFIG_KEXEC
 static void perf_pmu_rotate_stop(struct pmu *pmu)
 {
 	struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx = this_cpu_ptr(pmu->pmu_cpu_context);
@@ -6383,6 +6384,26 @@ static void perf_event_exit_cpu(int cpu)
 static inline void perf_event_exit_cpu(int cpu) { }
 #endif
 
+static int
+perf_reboot(struct notifier_block *notifier, unsigned long val, void *v)
+{
+	int cpu;
+
+	for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
+		perf_event_exit_cpu(cpu);
+
+	return NOTIFY_OK;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Run the perf reboot notifier at the very last possible moment so that
+ * the generic watchdog code runs as long as possible.
+ */
+static struct notifier_block perf_reboot_notifier = {
+	.notifier_call = perf_reboot,
+	.priority = INT_MIN,
+};
+
 static int __cpuinit
 perf_cpu_notify(struct notifier_block *self, unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
 {
@@ -6418,6 +6439,7 @@ void __init perf_event_init(void)
 	perf_pmu_register(&perf_task_clock);
 	perf_tp_register();
 	perf_cpu_notifier(perf_cpu_notify);
+	register_reboot_notifier(&perf_reboot_notifier);
 
 	ret = init_hw_breakpoint();
 	WARN(ret, "hw_breakpoint initialization failed with: %d", ret);


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-12-08 14:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-01  8:00 perf hw in kexeced kernel broken in tip Yinghai Lu
2010-12-01 11:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-01 16:06   ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-01 16:11     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-01 16:23       ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-01 19:38         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-01 19:46           ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-01 19:49             ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-01 19:58               ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-01 20:07                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-01 21:48                   ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-12-02  5:23                     ` Don Zickus
2010-12-02  7:34                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-02 16:15                         ` Don Zickus
2010-12-07 23:30                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-08 14:01                             ` Don Zickus
2010-12-08 14:20                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-08 14:42                                 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-08 14:48                                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-08 15:02                                     ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-08 15:15                                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-08 15:22                                         ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-08 21:16                                         ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-12-08 14:59                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-08 18:43                                   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-12-08 19:01                                     ` Don Zickus
2010-12-08 19:05                                       ` Yinghai Lu
2010-12-08 19:17                                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-08 19:20                                           ` Yinghai Lu
2010-12-08 19:06                                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-08 19:20                                       ` Yinghai Lu
2010-12-08 22:37                                   ` Don Zickus
2010-12-08 23:20                                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-12-09  4:34                                       ` Don Zickus
2010-12-09 20:20                                   ` Don Zickus
2010-12-09 20:44                                     ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2010-12-08 14:33                               ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2010-12-08 14:39                               ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-07 21:16                         ` Don Zickus
2010-12-08  0:26                           ` Yinghai Lu
2010-12-08 10:39                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-01 20:41               ` Eric W. Biederman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1291818811.28378.45.camel@laptop \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=hbabu@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=jason.wessel@windriver.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.