From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from pug.o-hand.com (3a.49.1343.static.theplanet.com [67.19.73.58]) by mx1.pokylinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C19B64C80B70 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 13:08:41 -0600 (CST) Received: from [192.168.1.181] (unknown [83.217.123.106]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pug.o-hand.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F15C612EC1C5 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 13:46:56 -0600 (CST) From: Joshua Lock To: poky@yoctoproject.org In-Reply-To: <4CFF8C70.7010803@mlbassoc.com> References: <4CFF8C70.7010803@mlbassoc.com> Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 19:08:32 +0000 Message-ID: <1291921712.6078.48.camel@scimitar> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 (2.32.1-1.fc14) Subject: Re: README.hardware X-BeenThere: poky@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Poky build system developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 19:08:41 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 06:47 -0700, Gary Thomas wrote: > This file seems quite out of date, in fact it's not been updated > for 9 months :-( > > I don't know enough details to suggest a patch, but I think it > would be useful to update it to reflect "today's Poky/Yocto" world, > especially with the new visibility of the project. > I agree, although I'm also wondering if it would be better to have this information on the wiki where it can be more easily maintained by the community. Or a balance? any machine in meta/conf/machine documented in README.hardware and anything else on the wiki. Thoughts? Cheers, Joshua -- Joshua Lock Intel Open Source Technology Centre