From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Bartlett Subject: Re: [PATCH] cifs: Support for an upcall to map SID to an uid and a gid Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 14:48:04 +1100 Message-ID: <1292125684.7313.4.camel@ruth> References: <1291741872-22747-1-git-send-email-shirishpargaonkar@gmail.com> <20101211111716.1e21be41@corrin.poochiereds.net> <20101211193003.4a11fc7f@corrin.poochiereds.net> <20101211221159.36e6c814@corrin.poochiereds.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-yhKBYH/wQiBWcN0D6zYl" Cc: Richard Sharpe , dhowells-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, smfrench-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, samba-technical , linux-cifs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Jeff Layton Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20101211221159.36e6c814-4QP7MXygkU+dMjc06nkz3ljfA9RmPOcC@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-cifs-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: --=-yhKBYH/wQiBWcN0D6zYl Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2010-12-11 at 22:11 -0500, Jeff Layton wrote: > On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 19:57:11 -0500 > Richard Sharpe wrote: >=20 > > On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 7:30 PM, Jeff Layton wrote: > > >> > > >> Will look into this. One thing that concerns me is if a cached etnr= y > > >> for a SID with its name and an id (either an uid or a gid), if that = SID > > >> now represents a different object and has differernt name, would > > >> not cached info be incorrect? Not sure if this can ever happen > > >> or how would it happen and if it does, what would be a trigger > > >> for a cache revalidation and purges! > > >> > > > > > > Sure, mappings can change. But, you still have the same problem with > > > what you're proposing in these patches. The userspace program isn't > > > setting a timeout on the key. Once a mapping is put in the keyring, > > > it's there until it's revoked. You probably want to set a max TTL for > > > the entries in the cache regardless of what scheme is used. > >=20 > > I was under the impression that SIDs are never reused. Perhaps I am mis= taken. > >=20 >=20 > That may be, but the mapping of a SID is dependent upon settings in > config files that could change. It seems reasonable to me to only cache > these mappings for a period of time in the event that they do. That > period of time could default to being rather long and be tunable. I think that instead some explicit signal should be made to indicate that a mapping has changed, so you don't have to worry about cache times. It should change *very* rarely and only on specific administrator intervention. We do a lot of things to avoid this happening in the normal course of events.=20 Andrew Bartlett --=20 Andrew Bartlett http://samba.org/~abartlet/ Authentication Developer, Samba Team http://samba.org Samba Developer, Cisco Inc. --=-yhKBYH/wQiBWcN0D6zYl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBNBEX0z4A8Wyi0NrsRAvMxAKCbfRMdbnBDNwBdgvAEpxjhI9XRmwCgoSm6 WXAsHIgHCEKZJ38pbuVwcX0= =pfJn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-yhKBYH/wQiBWcN0D6zYl--