All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
To: Shmulik Hen <shmulik.hen@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: System blocks (hangs) on ifconfig up
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 23:03:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1292194983.3136.294.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D04E38A.1040605@trego.co.il>

On Sun, 2010-12-12 at 17:00 +0200, Shmulik Hen wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> My system is Ubuntu 10.04, running kernel 2.6.32-26-generic.
> 
> Whenever I try to bring up a specific ethernet interface for the second 
> time, my
> system becomes unresponsive for 60 seconds - i.e. no mouse, no keyboard, no
> screen refresh. etc.
> 
> Looking at the driver's code, I could see that it's dev->open() method calls
> wait_event_interruptible_timeout() with a timeout of 60 seconds - exactly
> the delay I'm seeing.

That seems like a stupid thing for it to do.

> I have narrowed the code to a bare minimum (see below - loosely based on
> dummy.c), which only calls mdelay(10000) in it's dev->open() method, and
> still, my system blocks for exactly 10 seconds when I run the following
> sequence:
> 
>  > sudo ifconfig shmulik0 up
>  > sudo ifconfig shmulik0 down
>  > sudo ifconfig shmulik0 up
> 
> At this point - the system is stuck for 10 seconds.

Bringing an interface up or down is a synchronous operation and is
serialised with most other network configuration operations.  So this is
the expected behaviour.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.


  reply	other threads:[~2010-12-12 23:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-12 15:00 System blocks (hangs) on ifconfig up Shmulik Hen
2010-12-12 23:03 ` Ben Hutchings [this message]
2010-12-13  9:14   ` Shmulik Hen
2010-12-13 12:37     ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-13 13:11       ` Shmulik Hen
2010-12-12 23:29 ` Stephen Hemminger
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-12-12 15:08 Shmulik Hen
2010-12-12 20:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2010-12-12 20:53   ` Eric Dumazet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1292194983.3136.294.camel@localhost \
    --to=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shmulik.hen@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.