From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=53659 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PSChb-0005kM-L8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 13:00:49 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PSCha-0000qx-HA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 13:00:47 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:3101) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PSCha-0000qo-AU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 13:00:46 -0500 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oBDI0jJR003805 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 13:00:45 -0500 From: Alex Williamson In-Reply-To: <20101213175010.GD7182@redhat.com> References: <20101209191623.15450.19696.stgit@s20.home> <1291932857.2926.20.camel@x201> <20101212102812.GA13033@redhat.com> <20101212120120.GA15016@redhat.com> <1292171345.2857.43.camel@x201> <1292262202.2857.114.camel@x201> <20101213175010.GD7182@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:00:44 -0700 Message-ID: <1292263244.2857.120.camel@x201> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] rtl8139: IO memory is not part of vmstate List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, quintela@redhat.com On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 19:50 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:43:22AM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote: > > So, unfortunately, I stand by my original patch. > > What about the one that put -1 in saved index for a hotplugged device? There are still examples that don't work even without hotplug (example 2 and example 3 after the reboot). That hack limits the damage, but still leaves a latent bug for reboot and doesn't address the non-hotplug scenarios. So, I don't think it's worthwhile to pursue, and we shouldn't pretend we can use it to avoid bumping the version_id. Thanks, Alex