From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from pug.o-hand.com (3a.49.1343.static.theplanet.com [67.19.73.58]) by mx1.pokylinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 984D84C81081 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 09:45:27 -0600 (CST) Received: from [192.168.0.7] (5ad2c26b.bb.sky.com [90.210.194.107]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pug.o-hand.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17E1912EC1F6 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:24:05 -0600 (CST) From: Joshua Lock To: poky@yoctoproject.org In-Reply-To: <201012160949.49288.paul.eggleton@intel.com> References: <4D0916F4.9060703@linux.intel.com> <201012160949.49288.paul.eggleton@intel.com> Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 15:45:19 +0000 Message-ID: <1292514319.2472.3.camel@scimitar> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 (2.32.1-1.fc14) Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/14] openssl-native: disable execstack flag to prevent problems with SELinux X-BeenThere: poky@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Poky build system developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 15:45:27 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 09:49 +0000, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Wednesday 15 December 2010 19:28:52 Darren Hart wrote: > > > - -DTERMIO ${FULL_OPTIMIZATION} -Wall" > > > + -DTERMIO ${FULL_OPTIMIZATION}" > > > > Why do we need to remove -Wall? Doesn't that reduce our visibility into > > potential issues? > > We don't - actually this was a mistake that I was sure had I removed from the original patch. -Wall should be put back in. I've merged the patch which does this to josh/laverne. Cheers, Joshua -- Joshua Lock Intel Open Source Technology Centre