From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from pug.o-hand.com (3a.49.1343.static.theplanet.com [67.19.73.58]) by mx1.pokylinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABAE64C80039 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 08:02:54 -0600 (CST) Received: from [10.250.128.97] (unknown [158.43.2.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pug.o-hand.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EFDD12EC1CD for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 08:41:53 -0600 (CST) From: Joshua Lock To: poky@yoctoproject.org In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 14:02:46 +0000 Message-ID: <1293026566.13942.7.camel@scimitar> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 (2.32.1-1.fc14) Subject: Re: Replacement for fakeroot do_install()? X-BeenThere: poky@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Poky build system developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 14:02:54 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 14:48 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: > Hi, > > What's is the pseudo way to do fakeroot do_install()? I have a number > of OE recipes that still use fakeroot and I would like to get rid of > that in the OE layer for yocto. fakeroot is a flag which tells the runqueue to load appropriate environment variables for running the task under a fakeroot like program, and as such it's still perfectly valid whether you're using fakeroot or pseudo. tl;dr fakeroot do_install() is the pseudo way too Cheers, Joshua -- Joshua Lock Intel Open Source Technology Centre