From: "Guy, Wey-Yi" <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
To: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Cc: Intel Linux Wireless <ilw@linux.intel.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iwlagn: fix scan tx antenna setting on 5Ghz band
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 08:57:47 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1293037067.3997.42.camel@wwguy-huron> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101222131515.GA2242@redhat.com>
Stanislaw,
On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 05:15 -0800, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> Hi Wey
>
> > > > If its is 2.4, we need to use the correct tx antenna, I think we can
> > > > remove this block of code all together since check already done above.
> > > >
> > > > if (priv->cfg->scan_tx_antennas[band])
> > > > scan_tx_antennas = priv->cfg->scan_tx_antennas[band];
> > >
> > > Is correct to use all antennas on 5GHz when blutooth is enabled?
> > > For me, more logical would be limiting to one antenna no matter of band,
> > > since antennas are used anyway, only frequencies differ.
> > >
> > > For rx_ant, we do not check the band, only limit to first one
> > > when bluetooth is used.
> >
> > there is no BT coex if 5GHz is used because there is not interference
> > between 2.4 and 5GHz, so both antenna can be used. WiFi should operated
> > in normal condition.
> >
> > For 2.4GHz, we also can use both antenna if there is not high traffic
> > load on BT side.
> >
> > but you have a good catch, driver need to check band before use it
> > (scan_tx_antenna[band])
>
> So how about this patch (rfc only):
>
> From 26d0570ed5cd85097702d0fedb2c3f831dce9714 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
> Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 13:03:31 +0100
> Subject: [RFC PATCH] iwlagn: fix scan tx antenna setting on 5Ghz band
>
> Looks that we do not set correctly antennas when scanning
> on 5Ghz band and when bluetooth is enabled, because
> priv->cfg->scan_tx_antennas[band] is only defined for
> IEEE80211_BAND_2GHZ.
>
> To fix we check band before limiting antennas to first one.
> This allow to remove hard coded cfg->scan_tx_antennas[band].
>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-6000.c | 7 +------
> drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c | 9 +++------
> drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-core.h | 1 -
> 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-6000.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-6000.c
> index f4bec32..af505bc 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-6000.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-6000.c
> @@ -596,12 +596,7 @@ struct iwl_cfg iwl6005_2bg_cfg = {
> .need_dc_calib = true, \
> .need_temp_offset_calib = true, \
> .led_mode = IWL_LED_RF_STATE, \
> - .adv_pm = true, \
> - /* \
> - *Due to bluetooth, we transmit 2.4 GHz probes \
> - * only on antenna A \
> - */ \
> - .scan_tx_antennas[IEEE80211_BAND_2GHZ] = ANT_A
> + .adv_pm = true \
>
> struct iwl_cfg iwl6030_2agn_cfg = {
> .name = "Intel(R) Centrino(R) Advanced-N 6230 AGN",
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c
> index 4bc82fc..322a2bd 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c
> @@ -1492,15 +1492,12 @@ int iwlagn_request_scan(struct iwl_priv *priv, struct ieee80211_vif *vif)
> if (priv->cfg->scan_rx_antennas[band])
> rx_ant = priv->cfg->scan_rx_antennas[band];
>
> - if (priv->cfg->scan_tx_antennas[band])
> - scan_tx_antennas = priv->cfg->scan_tx_antennas[band];
> -
> - if (priv->cfg->bt_params &&
> + if (band == IEEE80211_BAND_2GHZ &&
> + priv->cfg->bt_params &&
> priv->cfg->bt_params->advanced_bt_coexist &&
> priv->bt_full_concurrent) {
> /* operated as 1x1 in full concurrency mode */
> - scan_tx_antennas = first_antenna(
> - priv->cfg->scan_tx_antennas[band]);
> + scan_tx_antennas = first_antenna(scan_tx_antennas);
> }
Please remove the checking for priv->bt_full_concurrent, so the checking
will apply to all scan request if BT coex is there.
otherwise, the patch looks ok
thanks
Wey
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-22 17:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-20 17:05 [PATCH] iwlagn: fix scan tx antenna setting on 5Ghz band Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-12-20 18:13 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2010-12-21 12:05 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-12-21 17:21 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2010-12-22 13:15 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-12-22 16:57 ` Guy, Wey-Yi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1293037067.3997.42.camel@wwguy-huron \
--to=wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com \
--cc=ilw@linux.intel.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sgruszka@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.