From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Dmitry Kozlyuk <dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com>
Cc: Fady Bader <fady@mellanox.com>,
dev@dpdk.org, tbashar@mellanox.com, talshn@mellanox.com,
yohadt@mellanox.com, harini.ramakrishnan@microsoft.com,
ocardona@microsoft.com, pallavi.kadam@intel.com,
ranjit.menon@intel.com, olivier.matz@6wind.com,
arybchenko@solarflare.com, mdr@ashroe.eu, nhorman@tuxdriver.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] mempool: use generic memory management
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2020 23:14:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <12936534.z0KI8IRTVO@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200601225921.371ebfa6@sovereign>
01/06/2020 21:59, Dmitry Kozlyuk:
> 1. What do you think about changing rte_ to rte_eal_ prefix for memory
> management wrappers in MM series as Andrew Rybchenko suggested for v1? Since
> the functions are DPDK-internal, this sounds reasonable to me.
For lib-internal function, the prefix should not start with rte_.
For exported function (even if internal), the prefix should be rte_[component]_.
For memory related functions, rte_mem_ is better than rte_eal_.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-01 21:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-01 10:31 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] build mempool on Windows Fady Bader
2020-06-01 10:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] eal: disable function versioning " Fady Bader
2020-06-01 19:55 ` Neil Horman
2020-06-01 21:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [EXTERNAL] " Omar Cardona
2020-06-02 10:27 ` Neil Horman
2020-06-02 10:40 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-06-11 10:09 ` Kinsella, Ray
2020-06-01 10:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] mempool: use generic memory management Fady Bader
2020-06-01 19:59 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2020-06-01 20:47 ` Ranjit Menon
2020-06-01 21:14 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2020-06-02 7:40 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2020-06-01 10:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] eal: export needed functions for mempool Fady Bader
2020-06-01 10:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] mempool: mempool build on Windows Fady Bader
2020-06-02 7:41 ` Andrew Rybchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=12936534.z0KI8IRTVO@thomas \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com \
--cc=fady@mellanox.com \
--cc=harini.ramakrishnan@microsoft.com \
--cc=mdr@ashroe.eu \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=ocardona@microsoft.com \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=pallavi.kadam@intel.com \
--cc=ranjit.menon@intel.com \
--cc=talshn@mellanox.com \
--cc=tbashar@mellanox.com \
--cc=yohadt@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.