All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
To: roel kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: eepro testing positive EBUSY return by request_irq()?
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 15:27:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1293809262.2870.45.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D1DECFC.8020701@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1400 bytes --]

On Fri, 2010-12-31 at 15:47 +0100, roel kluin wrote:
> Fix -EBUSY test for request_irq().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/eepro.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> I just found this in the code, no bug was observed. Is this patch needed? the test
> for an -EBUSY return by request_irq() occurs much more frequently in kernel code.
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/eepro.c b/drivers/net/eepro.c
> index 7c82631..47cfecb 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/eepro.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/eepro.c
> @@ -920,7 +920,7 @@ static int	eepro_grab_irq(struct net_device *dev)
>  
>  		eepro_sw2bank0(ioaddr); /* Switch back to Bank 0 */
>  
> -		if (request_irq (*irqp, NULL, IRQF_SHARED, "bogus", dev) != EBUSY) {
> +		if (request_irq (*irqp, NULL, IRQF_SHARED, "bogus", dev) != -EBUSY) {
>  			unsigned long irq_mask;
>  			/* Twinkle the interrupt, and check if it's seen */
>  			irq_mask = probe_irq_on();

This condition is completely bogus - request_irq() with a NULL handler
now returns -EINVAL before even checking whether the IRQ is in use.  The
code should be fixed along the lines of what I did for 3c503 in commit
b0cf4dfb7cd21556efd9a6a67edcba0840b4d98d.

The e2100 and hp net drivers have the same bug.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2010-12-31 15:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-31 14:47 [PATCH] net: eepro testing positive EBUSY return by request_irq()? roel kluin
2010-12-31 15:27 ` Ben Hutchings [this message]
2011-01-02 14:52   ` roel kluin
2011-01-02 19:51     ` Ben Hutchings
2011-01-03 19:37     ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1293809262.2870.45.camel@localhost \
    --to=ben@decadent.org.uk \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=roel.kluin@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.