Re: [Bitbake-dev] Bitbake Architecture, Roadmap, Maintainers and the future

[Marcin Juszkiewicz <marcin@juszkiewicz.com.pl>]

> There is a little friction around bitbake at the moment. I think after a
> discussion I had with Chris earlier on some things are clearer and its
> probably good to summarise how things stand.

Thank You Richard for mail.
 
> Rightly or wrongly, maintainership of a project like bitbake is as much
> about socialising changes and getting discussion and agreement on them
> as it is about developing code. It eats a lot of time, you don't get
> much thanks for it but it does make life smoother in the long run. 

> I consider myself a maintainer of bitbake

So do I - for me you are Bitbake maintainer. And I am fine with having Chris and you as maintainers.

> So, bitbake in the future? At present it has bits on berlios (releases,
> mailing list and a web manpage) and the git source SCM on
> git.openembedded.org. Are we happy with those locations? I find it a bit
> confusing...

I think that we should replace berlios with redirects to OE infrastructure. Tarballs should be available for download for any 1.8.0+ releases (older ones should not be in use now and can be generated from cgit). Manual available as separate website. I prefer to not host it at Yocto.
 
> There are a bunch of people who can commit to bitbake, some inactive,
> some active in different areas with different priorities. I think mine
> are clear above, I'd appreciate others to make their objectives clear so
> everyone understand people's positions and what people plan and don't
> plan to do.

I still have r/w to bitbake svn, no idea about git tree. There is no need for it so please remove my write access. If there will be a need for it I will send patches + pull request to proper mailing list.