From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5783175940231592389==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Marcel Holtmann Subject: Re: [RFC PATCHv2 1/4] Automatic provisioning of GPRS context settings Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2011 12:31:16 -0800 Message-ID: <1294086676.5852.11.camel@aeonflux> In-Reply-To: <1294054101.3120.1577.camel@tucson> List-Id: To: ofono@ofono.org --===============5783175940231592389== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Aki, > > Any particular reason why you can't use the > > same format as in mobile-broadband-provider-info? > = > I think reusing the format here makes sense, actually. If not for > anything else than to be able to use an existing database for testing. my thinking was that we should read the MBPI database if present and use it as much as possible. Since oFono will not ship a database by default anyway. However we do need an extensible way of per-operator overrides at least. And while MBPI database might work on the desktop, I think it will fail on a mobile phone. The information in it are too desktop centric. I also have a small problem on how it tries to solve the problem of virtual providers and/or different contract details. This part of the database if more designed for UI usage than for system usage. Regards Marcel --===============5783175940231592389==--