From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1751716Ab1ADQlh (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 4 Jan 2011 11:41:37 -0500
Received: from canuck.infradead.org ([134.117.69.58]:58721 "EHLO
	canuck.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1750954Ab1ADQlg convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 4 Jan 2011 11:41:36 -0500
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] Refactoring sched_entity and sched_rt_entity.
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.de.marchi@gmail.com>
Cc: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@linux.it>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
        Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Dhaval Giani <dhaval@retis.sssup.it>,
        Fabio Checconi <fabio@gandalf.sssup.it>,
        Darren Hart <darren@dvhart.com>, oleg <oleg@redhat.com>,
        paulmck <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, pjt@google.com,
        bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.co
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=wCmetef0tjfvdHtZMS9x4eswhL_xAM5Ybdwq+@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1294156524.6169.147.camel@Palantir>
	 <AANLkTi=wCmetef0tjfvdHtZMS9x4eswhL_xAM5Ybdwq+@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 17:41:43 +0100
Message-ID: <1294159303.2016.167.camel@laptop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 14:37 -0200, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> 
> Peter, isn't sched_fair_entity a better name?
> 
> 
Yeah, it probably is..