From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237] helo=tim.rpsys.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PaG99-0003iW-8g for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2011 00:18:31 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p04NI7t5004050; Tue, 4 Jan 2011 23:18:07 GMT Received: from tim.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (tim.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 03934-04; Tue, 4 Jan 2011 23:18:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.3.10] ([192.168.3.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by tim.rpsys.net (8.13.6/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p04NI0uC004044 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 4 Jan 2011 23:18:00 GMT From: Richard Purdie To: Otavio Salvador In-Reply-To: References: <1293763348.17519.11220.camel@rex> <1293805474.18787.366.camel@eha> <1293911357.17519.17117.camel@rex> <1294155569.17519.21577.camel@rex> Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 23:17:43 +0000 Message-ID: <1294183063.17519.22104.camel@rex> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rpsys.net Cc: Chris Larson , bitbake-dev , openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [Bitbake-dev] Bitbake Architecture, Roadmap, Maintainers and the future X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 23:18:31 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 15:00 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 13:39, Richard Purdie wrote: > ... > > This kind of response from you is frustrating. Trying to ask any > > question results in a response like this and I don't think its > > productive or helpful. > > Can we try to get something done instead of this useless type of discussion? I really don't know what Chris is/isn't prepared to do in future to ensure this doesn't happen again but I'm doing what I can in that regard. I'm pleased to report Poky's copy of bitbake is now much more in sync with bitbake master as of earlier today. This has resulted in some issues for Poky but thats life and we're working through them, its not a problem. I've asked Chris what the status of his poky-sync branch is and assuming some further testing pans out I think that will get merged into bitbake master soon. This leaves some small details to sort out as I think there are still some tweaks bitbake upsteam needs from Poky. I'm trying to work out those details and will follow up in other emails. I've already started some of the discussion in the logging thread for one of the areas there are differences in approach. I'm also going to look at getting back the XMLRPC interfaces and abstraction that the removal of triggered this discussion. There does appear to be some differences in opinion on the future of bitbake from the server/UI perspective and I will do what I can to ensure we all have common goals. I've also agreed that I'm going to pay close attention to the bitbake-dev list. I've asked that any major roadmap/architecture changes do get discussed there. Cheers, Richard