From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from pug.o-hand.com (3a.49.1343.static.theplanet.com [67.19.73.58]) by mx1.pokylinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3E904C80050 for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 12:13:22 -0600 (CST) Received: from [192.168.0.7] (5ad4d7b0.bb.sky.com [90.212.215.176]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pug.o-hand.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66C6D12EC118 for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2011 12:53:27 -0600 (CST) From: Joshua Lock To: poky@yoctoproject.org In-Reply-To: <1292872200.2466.58.camel@scimitar> References: <1292872200.2466.58.camel@scimitar> Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 18:13:15 +0000 Message-ID: <1294683195.2451.12.camel@scimitar> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 (2.32.1-1.fc14) Subject: Re: Poky Laverne point release X-BeenThere: poky@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Poky build system developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 18:13:23 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2010-12-20 at 19:10 +0000, Joshua Lock wrote: > Hi all, > > I've a branch on poky-contrib (josh/laverne) which fixes the Makefiles > in several recipes such that I can do builds of all our targets on > Fedora 14 with it's new, stricter, make version (3.82). > > This makes me think it's time to start pulling together a Laverne point > release but we don't really have a handle on what these should include. > > For the Green point release I cooked I just went through commits since > the release and did sniff testing, but I think we can do better. > Plus I started to do that for Laverne but there's been some almost 900 > commits since then... > > So, to the point of this message, I'm looking for people to nominate > fixes for the Laverne branch. Even better if you share a git hash. > > To start the ball rolling I'm going to suggest: > * Make 3.82 fixes > * Qemu script enhancements/fixes > * Bitbake fetcher fixes > > > And you? What fixes would you suggest? I guess we don't have many users of Laverne? Cheers, Joshua -- Joshua Lock Intel Open Source Technology Centre