From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by mx1.pokylinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C5DE4C81003 for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2011 21:43:51 -0600 (CST) Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 Jan 2011 19:43:50 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,325,1291622400"; d="scan'208";a="593215861" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.255.14.43]) ([10.255.14.43]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 Jan 2011 19:43:49 -0800 From: Tom Zanussi To: Bruce Ashfield In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 21:43:46 -0600 Message-ID: <1295063026.31259.14.camel@elmorro> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Cc: "poky@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] linux-yocto: temporary NO_LIBPERL fix for perf X-BeenThere: poky@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Poky build system developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 03:43:51 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2011-01-14 at 18:46 -0800, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote: > > I'm not familiar enough with the perf recipe to come up with a proper > > fix for the problem yet, but this patch at least removes the build > > error that recently started happening with the linux-yocto perf > > compile. > > > > I'll send a patch re-instating the code it removes once I've > > understood the perf recipe and root-caused the problem. In any case, > > it doesn't remove any functionality that was there before - NO_LIBPERL > > was always the case, but the code that made that happen just started > > blowing up for some reason. > > > Thanks Tom! I was going to offer to merge this into the kernel > tree itself, since having external patches to the repo isn't something > we typically do. But in this case, the patch is temporary so I'm going > to just ack it, and stay out of the way. > Hi Bruce, The funny thing is that my first inclination and preference was to just submit the kernel patch, and I was about to do that anyway after having initial trouble getting it to apply this way... Anyway, I decided at least this way if you weren't around to apply it to the kernel tree, Saul was waiting for it and it would be applied regardless - next time I'll just do it the easy way ;-) Tom > Cheers, > > Bruce > > > > > Pull URL: git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib.git > > Branch: tzanussi/perf-no-libperl-fix > > Browse: http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=tzanussi/perf-no-libperl-fix > > > > Thanks, > > Tom Zanussi > > --- > > > > > > Tom Zanussi (1): > > linux-yocto: hard-code NO_LIBPERL/NO_LIBPYTHON > > > > .../linux-yocto/tools-perf-no-scripting.patch | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++ > > meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_git.bb | 5 +- > > 2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 meta/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto/tools-perf-no-scripting.patch > > > > _______________________________________________ > > poky mailing list > > poky@yoctoproject.org > > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/poky > > > > >