From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6244303495621575067==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Marcel Holtmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Allow distcheck to work without bluetooth Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 15:36:08 +0100 Message-ID: <1295447768.3873.246.camel@aeonflux> In-Reply-To: <201101191529.34193.remi.denis-courmont@nokia.com> List-Id: To: ofono@ofono.org --===============6244303495621575067== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Remi, > > > diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am > > > index c1c34ca..e93076a 100644 > > > --- a/Makefile.am > > > +++ b/Makefile.am > > > @@ -550,6 +550,9 @@ gatchat_test_qcdm_LDADD =3D @GLIB_LIBS@ > > > = > > > DISTCHECK_CONFIGURE_FLAGS =3D --disable-datafiles > > > = > > > +if !BLUETOOTH > > > +DISTCHECK_CONFIGURE_FLAGS +=3D --disable-bluetooth > > > +endif > > = > > this patch makes no sense to me. I am not going to apply it. Using make > > distcheck works nicely on my system where I build the releases. > = > I am not trying to steal your release privilege. I am trying to be able t= o = > test my changes to Makefiles or whatever. you could just install libbluetooth and this would be fine. I like to run make distcheck with everything enabled all the time. That is the only way to ensure that it does build properly. Regards Marcel --===============6244303495621575067==--