From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from pug.o-hand.com (3a.49.1343.static.theplanet.com [67.19.73.58]) by mx1.pokylinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC57D4C81065 for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2011 03:20:46 -0600 (CST) Received: from [192.168.0.7] (5ad4d7b0.bb.sky.com [90.212.215.176]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pug.o-hand.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3897E12EC1CA; Fri, 21 Jan 2011 04:01:27 -0600 (CST) From: Joshua Lock To: Koen Kooi In-Reply-To: <3E98DC04-B56F-4E97-A7AD-F2CFA0FB166C@dominion.thruhere.net> References: <4D38BC0B.7080501@intel.com> <4D38DFB5.3000907@intel.com> <1295600248.2382.10.camel@scimitar> <3E98DC04-B56F-4E97-A7AD-F2CFA0FB166C@dominion.thruhere.net> Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 09:20:38 +0000 Message-ID: <1295601638.2382.13.camel@scimitar> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 (2.32.1-1.fc14) Cc: poky@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] 2nd pull request: UX, gtk+/apr, Edwin, Jan19, 2011 X-BeenThere: poky@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Poky build system developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 09:20:46 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 10:00 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote: > >> Our poky seems never has stable release, and always use development > >> branch. Maybe we want some new feature? RP can comment. Another benefit > >> is development branch is under svn, so we can selectively pick some > >> modules instead of big whole repo. Given development branch, there is no > >> even/odd difference. > >> > >> I have a plan to change it to stable release with the cost of long > >> download & compile time, but I'm afraid can't make it in this release cycle. > > > > I think we need someone else to own downgrading this recipe for the next > > release then, we can't commit to a 6month stable cycle with an unstable > > software package. > > You might want to fix glib-2.0 as well, only a 2.27.x recipe is in yocto currently Yes, definitely. Cheers, Joshua -- Joshua Lock Intel Open Source Technology Centre