From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vasiliy G Tolstov Subject: RE: linux kernel 2.6.37 Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 09:40:40 +0300 Message-ID: <1296024040.11491.1.camel@mobile> References: <4D384204020000260001866B@hibbing.edu> <1295554269.22720.6.camel@mobile> <20110120201937.GR2754@reaktio.net> <1295563321.22720.17.camel@mobile> <20110121153056.GA4698@dumpdata.com> <1295626578.32475.2.camel@mobile> <1295900343.2349.6.camel@mobile> <20110125144523.GB7238@dumpdata.com 1295976929.2269.26.camel@mobile> Reply-To: v.tolstov@selfip.ru Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Dan Magenheimer Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Don Brearley , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Konrad Wilk List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 13:03 -0800, Dan Magenheimer wrote: > /me wonders if it might be related to this thread: > > http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2010-09/msg00987.html > > assuming the related patch got upstream. Jeremy cc'ed just in case. > I'm read mail thread and nothing found about patch. Does is not written yet? > I do NOT see this issue with 2.6.35.4. In fact, I now see > a MemTotal boot-time difference when I boot both with mem=512 > (in vm.cfg): 2.6.35.4 kernel shows 506864, 2.6.37 shows 495456. > Not as much as Vasiliy reports, but still a big mystery. 2.6.32.26 already have this issue.