From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (dan.rpsys.net [93.97.175.187]) by mx1.pokylinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7D254C811AB for ; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 09:15:20 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.2/8.14.2/Debian-2build1) with ESMTP id p0VFHIRt002251; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:17:19 GMT X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at dan.rpsys.net Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 0x97rLEf3yOV; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:17:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.1.42] (tim [93.97.173.237]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.2/8.14.2/Debian-2build1) with ESMTP id p0VFHEO4002239 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:17:16 GMT From: Richard Purdie To: "Zhai, Edwin" In-Reply-To: <4D46CEF9.7000808@intel.com> References: <4D46CEF9.7000808@intel.com> Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:15:04 +0000 Message-ID: <1296486904.13501.13316.camel@rex> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Cc: "poky@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] gdk-pixbuf: Fix the native png load error and remove duplicated recipe X-BeenThere: poky@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Poky build system developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:15:21 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 15:02 +0000, Zhai, Edwin wrote: > Koen, > I merged gdk-pixbuf & gdk-pixbuf-native, but do_split_packages make > gdk-pixbuf-native also provide gdk-pixbuf-loader-xxx then cause multiple > providers. Any way to comment it in gdk-pixbuf-native? PACKAGES_DYNAMIC_virtclass-native = "" > RP, > I saw your patch to resolve the multiple providers from gdk-pixbuf and > gtk+, and just was curious why not just remove old gtk+ recipes given no > others depend on them. Any other concerns? The old version of gtk+ has some sato patches we've yet to forward port to the newer gtk+. Its something I want to resolve before we delete it. As an added bonus we uncovered a nasty dependency provider problem in bitbake which was nice to fix. Cheers, Richard