From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Prasad <prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] perf: Cure task_oncpu_function_call() races
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:03:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1296569037.26581.194.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1296502154.26581.72.camel@laptop>
Oleg, I've actually run-tested the below and all seems well (clearly
I've never actually hit the races found before either, so in that
respect its not a conclusive test).
Can you agree with this patch?
---
Oleg reported that on architectures with
__ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW the IPI from task_oncpu_function_call()
can land before perf_event_task_sched_in() and cause interesting
situations for eg. perf_install_in_context().
This patch reworks the task_oncpu_function_call() interface to give a
more usable primitive as well as rework all its users to hopefully be
more obvious as well as remove the races.
Reported-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 7 --
kernel/perf_event.c | 240 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
kernel/sched.c | 29 +-----
3 files changed, 157 insertions(+), 119 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 3294f60..57ad0f9 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -2575,13 +2575,6 @@ static inline void inc_syscw(struct task_struct *tsk)
#define TASK_SIZE_OF(tsk) TASK_SIZE
#endif
-/*
- * Call the function if the target task is executing on a CPU right now:
- */
-extern void task_oncpu_function_call(struct task_struct *p,
- void (*func) (void *info), void *info);
-
-
#ifdef CONFIG_MM_OWNER
extern void mm_update_next_owner(struct mm_struct *mm);
extern void mm_init_owner(struct mm_struct *mm, struct task_struct *p);
diff --git a/kernel/perf_event.c b/kernel/perf_event.c
index 852ae8c..b81f31f 100644
--- a/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -38,6 +38,79 @@
#include <asm/irq_regs.h>
+struct remote_function_call {
+ struct task_struct *p;
+ int (*func)(void *info);
+ void *info;
+ int ret;
+};
+
+static void remote_function(void *data)
+{
+ struct remote_function_call *tfc = data;
+ struct task_struct *p = tfc->p;
+
+ if (p) {
+ tfc->ret = -EAGAIN;
+ if (task_cpu(p) != smp_processor_id() || !task_curr(p))
+ return;
+ }
+
+ tfc->ret = tfc->func(tfc->info);
+}
+
+/**
+ * task_function_call - call a function on the cpu on which a task runs
+ * @p: the task to evaluate
+ * @func: the function to be called
+ * @info: the function call argument
+ *
+ * Calls the function @func when the task is currently running. This might
+ * be on the current CPU, which just calls the function directly
+ *
+ * returns: @func return value, or
+ * -ESRCH - when the process isn't running
+ * -EAGAIN - when the process moved away
+ */
+static int
+task_function_call(struct task_struct *p, int (*func) (void *info), void *info)
+{
+ struct remote_function_call data = {
+ .p = p,
+ .func = func,
+ .info = info,
+ .ret = -ESRCH, /* No such (running) process */
+ };
+
+ if (task_curr(p))
+ smp_call_function_single(task_cpu(p), remote_function, &data, 1);
+
+ return data.ret;
+}
+
+/**
+ * cpu_function_call - call a function on the cpu
+ * @func: the function to be called
+ * @info: the function call argument
+ *
+ * Calls the function @func on the remote cpu.
+ *
+ * returns: @func return value or -ENXIO when the cpu is offline
+ */
+static int cpu_function_call(int cpu, int (*func) (void *info), void *info)
+{
+ struct remote_function_call data = {
+ .p = NULL,
+ .func = func,
+ .info = info,
+ .ret = -ENXIO, /* No such CPU */
+ };
+
+ smp_call_function_single(cpu, remote_function, &data, 1);
+
+ return data.ret;
+}
+
enum event_type_t {
EVENT_FLEXIBLE = 0x1,
EVENT_PINNED = 0x2,
@@ -618,35 +691,24 @@ __get_cpu_context(struct perf_event_context *ctx)
* We disable the event on the hardware level first. After that we
* remove it from the context list.
*/
-static void __perf_event_remove_from_context(void *info)
+static int __perf_remove_from_context(void *info)
{
struct perf_event *event = info;
struct perf_event_context *ctx = event->ctx;
struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx = __get_cpu_context(ctx);
- /*
- * If this is a task context, we need to check whether it is
- * the current task context of this cpu. If not it has been
- * scheduled out before the smp call arrived.
- */
- if (ctx->task && cpuctx->task_ctx != ctx)
- return;
-
raw_spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
-
event_sched_out(event, cpuctx, ctx);
-
list_del_event(event, ctx);
-
raw_spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
+
+ return 0;
}
/*
* Remove the event from a task's (or a CPU's) list of events.
*
- * Must be called with ctx->mutex held.
- *
* CPU events are removed with a smp call. For task events we only
* call when the task is on a CPU.
*
@@ -657,49 +719,48 @@ static void __perf_event_remove_from_context(void *info)
* When called from perf_event_exit_task, it's OK because the
* context has been detached from its task.
*/
-static void perf_event_remove_from_context(struct perf_event *event)
+static void perf_remove_from_context(struct perf_event *event)
{
struct perf_event_context *ctx = event->ctx;
struct task_struct *task = ctx->task;
+ lockdep_assert_held(&ctx->mutex);
+
if (!task) {
/*
* Per cpu events are removed via an smp call and
* the removal is always successful.
*/
- smp_call_function_single(event->cpu,
- __perf_event_remove_from_context,
- event, 1);
+ cpu_function_call(event->cpu, __perf_remove_from_context, event);
return;
}
retry:
- task_oncpu_function_call(task, __perf_event_remove_from_context,
- event);
+ if (!task_function_call(task, __perf_remove_from_context, event))
+ return;
raw_spin_lock_irq(&ctx->lock);
/*
- * If the context is active we need to retry the smp call.
+ * If we failed to find a running task, but find it running now that
+ * we've acquired the ctx->lock, retry.
*/
- if (ctx->nr_active && !list_empty(&event->group_entry)) {
+ if (task_curr(task)) {
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock);
goto retry;
}
/*
- * The lock prevents that this context is scheduled in so we
- * can remove the event safely, if the call above did not
- * succeed.
+ * Since the task isn't running, its safe to remove the event, us
+ * holding the ctx->lock ensures the task won't get scheduled in.
*/
- if (!list_empty(&event->group_entry))
- list_del_event(event, ctx);
+ list_del_event(event, ctx);
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock);
}
/*
* Cross CPU call to disable a performance event
*/
-static void __perf_event_disable(void *info)
+static int __perf_event_disable(void *info)
{
struct perf_event *event = info;
struct perf_event_context *ctx = event->ctx;
@@ -708,9 +769,12 @@ static void __perf_event_disable(void *info)
/*
* If this is a per-task event, need to check whether this
* event's task is the current task on this cpu.
+ *
+ * Can trigger due to concurrent perf_event_context_sched_out()
+ * flipping contexts around.
*/
if (ctx->task && cpuctx->task_ctx != ctx)
- return;
+ return -EINVAL;
raw_spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
@@ -729,6 +793,8 @@ static void __perf_event_disable(void *info)
}
raw_spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
+
+ return 0;
}
/*
@@ -753,13 +819,13 @@ void perf_event_disable(struct perf_event *event)
/*
* Disable the event on the cpu that it's on
*/
- smp_call_function_single(event->cpu, __perf_event_disable,
- event, 1);
+ cpu_function_call(event->cpu, __perf_event_disable, event);
return;
}
retry:
- task_oncpu_function_call(task, __perf_event_disable, event);
+ if (!task_function_call(task, __perf_event_disable, event))
+ return;
raw_spin_lock_irq(&ctx->lock);
/*
@@ -767,6 +833,11 @@ retry:
*/
if (event->state == PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE) {
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock);
+ /*
+ * Reload the task pointer, it might have been changed by
+ * a concurrent perf_event_context_sched_out().
+ */
+ task = ctx->task;
goto retry;
}
@@ -778,7 +849,6 @@ retry:
update_group_times(event);
event->state = PERF_EVENT_STATE_OFF;
}
-
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock);
}
@@ -928,12 +998,14 @@ static void add_event_to_ctx(struct perf_event *event,
event->tstamp_stopped = tstamp;
}
+static void perf_event_context_sched_in(struct perf_event_context *ctx);
+
/*
* Cross CPU call to install and enable a performance event
*
* Must be called with ctx->mutex held
*/
-static void __perf_install_in_context(void *info)
+static int __perf_install_in_context(void *info)
{
struct perf_event *event = info;
struct perf_event_context *ctx = event->ctx;
@@ -942,17 +1014,12 @@ static void __perf_install_in_context(void *info)
int err;
/*
- * If this is a task context, we need to check whether it is
- * the current task context of this cpu. If not it has been
- * scheduled out before the smp call arrived.
- * Or possibly this is the right context but it isn't
- * on this cpu because it had no events.
+ * In case we're installing a new context to an already running task,
+ * could also happen before perf_event_task_sched_in() on architectures
+ * which do context switches with IRQs enabled.
*/
- if (ctx->task && cpuctx->task_ctx != ctx) {
- if (cpuctx->task_ctx || ctx->task != current)
- return;
- cpuctx->task_ctx = ctx;
- }
+ if (ctx->task && !cpuctx->task_ctx)
+ perf_event_context_sched_in(ctx);
raw_spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
ctx->is_active = 1;
@@ -997,6 +1064,8 @@ static void __perf_install_in_context(void *info)
unlock:
raw_spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
+
+ return 0;
}
/*
@@ -1008,8 +1077,6 @@ unlock:
* If the event is attached to a task which is on a CPU we use a smp
* call to enable it in the task context. The task might have been
* scheduled away, but we check this in the smp call again.
- *
- * Must be called with ctx->mutex held.
*/
static void
perf_install_in_context(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
@@ -1018,6 +1085,8 @@ perf_install_in_context(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
{
struct task_struct *task = ctx->task;
+ lockdep_assert_held(&ctx->mutex);
+
event->ctx = ctx;
if (!task) {
@@ -1025,31 +1094,29 @@ perf_install_in_context(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
* Per cpu events are installed via an smp call and
* the install is always successful.
*/
- smp_call_function_single(cpu, __perf_install_in_context,
- event, 1);
+ cpu_function_call(cpu, __perf_install_in_context, event);
return;
}
retry:
- task_oncpu_function_call(task, __perf_install_in_context,
- event);
+ if (!task_function_call(task, __perf_install_in_context, event))
+ return;
raw_spin_lock_irq(&ctx->lock);
/*
- * we need to retry the smp call.
+ * If we failed to find a running task, but find it running now that
+ * we've acquired the ctx->lock, retry.
*/
- if (ctx->is_active && list_empty(&event->group_entry)) {
+ if (task_curr(task)) {
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock);
goto retry;
}
/*
- * The lock prevents that this context is scheduled in so we
- * can add the event safely, if it the call above did not
- * succeed.
+ * Since the task isn't running, its safe to add the event, us holding
+ * the ctx->lock ensures the task won't get scheduled in.
*/
- if (list_empty(&event->group_entry))
- add_event_to_ctx(event, ctx);
+ add_event_to_ctx(event, ctx);
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock);
}
@@ -1078,7 +1145,7 @@ static void __perf_event_mark_enabled(struct perf_event *event,
/*
* Cross CPU call to enable a performance event
*/
-static void __perf_event_enable(void *info)
+static int __perf_event_enable(void *info)
{
struct perf_event *event = info;
struct perf_event_context *ctx = event->ctx;
@@ -1086,18 +1153,10 @@ static void __perf_event_enable(void *info)
struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx = __get_cpu_context(ctx);
int err;
- /*
- * If this is a per-task event, need to check whether this
- * event's task is the current task on this cpu.
- */
- if (ctx->task && cpuctx->task_ctx != ctx) {
- if (cpuctx->task_ctx || ctx->task != current)
- return;
- cpuctx->task_ctx = ctx;
- }
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!ctx->is_active))
+ return -EINVAL;
raw_spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
- ctx->is_active = 1;
update_context_time(ctx);
if (event->state >= PERF_EVENT_STATE_INACTIVE)
@@ -1138,6 +1197,8 @@ static void __perf_event_enable(void *info)
unlock:
raw_spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
+
+ return 0;
}
/*
@@ -1158,8 +1219,7 @@ void perf_event_enable(struct perf_event *event)
/*
* Enable the event on the cpu that it's on
*/
- smp_call_function_single(event->cpu, __perf_event_enable,
- event, 1);
+ cpu_function_call(event->cpu, __perf_event_enable, event);
return;
}
@@ -1178,8 +1238,15 @@ void perf_event_enable(struct perf_event *event)
event->state = PERF_EVENT_STATE_OFF;
retry:
+ if (!ctx->is_active) {
+ __perf_event_mark_enabled(event, ctx);
+ goto out;
+ }
+
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock);
- task_oncpu_function_call(task, __perf_event_enable, event);
+
+ if (!task_function_call(task, __perf_event_enable, event))
+ return;
raw_spin_lock_irq(&ctx->lock);
@@ -1187,15 +1254,14 @@ retry:
* If the context is active and the event is still off,
* we need to retry the cross-call.
*/
- if (ctx->is_active && event->state == PERF_EVENT_STATE_OFF)
+ if (ctx->is_active && event->state == PERF_EVENT_STATE_OFF) {
+ /*
+ * task could have been flipped by a concurrent
+ * perf_event_context_sched_out()
+ */
+ task = ctx->task;
goto retry;
-
- /*
- * Since we have the lock this context can't be scheduled
- * in, so we can change the state safely.
- */
- if (event->state == PERF_EVENT_STATE_OFF)
- __perf_event_mark_enabled(event, ctx);
+ }
out:
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock);
@@ -1339,8 +1405,8 @@ static void perf_event_sync_stat(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
}
}
-void perf_event_context_sched_out(struct task_struct *task, int ctxn,
- struct task_struct *next)
+static void perf_event_context_sched_out(struct task_struct *task, int ctxn,
+ struct task_struct *next)
{
struct perf_event_context *ctx = task->perf_event_ctxp[ctxn];
struct perf_event_context *next_ctx;
@@ -1541,7 +1607,7 @@ static void task_ctx_sched_in(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
cpuctx->task_ctx = ctx;
}
-void perf_event_context_sched_in(struct perf_event_context *ctx)
+static void perf_event_context_sched_in(struct perf_event_context *ctx)
{
struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx;
@@ -5949,10 +6015,10 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(perf_event_open,
struct perf_event_context *gctx = group_leader->ctx;
mutex_lock(&gctx->mutex);
- perf_event_remove_from_context(group_leader);
+ perf_remove_from_context(group_leader);
list_for_each_entry(sibling, &group_leader->sibling_list,
group_entry) {
- perf_event_remove_from_context(sibling);
+ perf_remove_from_context(sibling);
put_ctx(gctx);
}
mutex_unlock(&gctx->mutex);
@@ -6103,7 +6169,7 @@ __perf_event_exit_task(struct perf_event *child_event,
{
struct perf_event *parent_event;
- perf_event_remove_from_context(child_event);
+ perf_remove_from_context(child_event);
parent_event = child_event->parent;
/*
@@ -6594,9 +6660,9 @@ static void __perf_event_exit_context(void *__info)
perf_pmu_rotate_stop(ctx->pmu);
list_for_each_entry_safe(event, tmp, &ctx->pinned_groups, group_entry)
- __perf_event_remove_from_context(event);
+ __perf_remove_from_context(event);
list_for_each_entry_safe(event, tmp, &ctx->flexible_groups, group_entry)
- __perf_event_remove_from_context(event);
+ __perf_remove_from_context(event);
}
static void perf_event_exit_cpu_context(int cpu)
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 477e1bc..6daa737 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -2297,27 +2297,6 @@ void kick_process(struct task_struct *p)
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kick_process);
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
-/**
- * task_oncpu_function_call - call a function on the cpu on which a task runs
- * @p: the task to evaluate
- * @func: the function to be called
- * @info: the function call argument
- *
- * Calls the function @func when the task is currently running. This might
- * be on the current CPU, which just calls the function directly
- */
-void task_oncpu_function_call(struct task_struct *p,
- void (*func) (void *info), void *info)
-{
- int cpu;
-
- preempt_disable();
- cpu = task_cpu(p);
- if (task_curr(p))
- smp_call_function_single(cpu, func, info, 1);
- preempt_enable();
-}
-
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
/*
* ->cpus_allowed is protected by either TASK_WAKING or rq->lock held.
@@ -2809,9 +2788,12 @@ static inline void
prepare_task_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev,
struct task_struct *next)
{
+ sched_info_switch(prev, next);
+ perf_event_task_sched_out(prev, next);
fire_sched_out_preempt_notifiers(prev, next);
prepare_lock_switch(rq, next);
prepare_arch_switch(next);
+ trace_sched_switch(prev, next);
}
/**
@@ -2944,7 +2926,7 @@ context_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev,
struct mm_struct *mm, *oldmm;
prepare_task_switch(rq, prev, next);
- trace_sched_switch(prev, next);
+
mm = next->mm;
oldmm = prev->active_mm;
/*
@@ -4116,9 +4098,6 @@ need_resched_nonpreemptible:
rq->skip_clock_update = 0;
if (likely(prev != next)) {
- sched_info_switch(prev, next);
- perf_event_task_sched_out(prev, next);
-
rq->nr_switches++;
rq->curr = next;
++*switch_count;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-01 14:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 91+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-08 14:56 Q: perf_event && task->ptrace_bps[] Oleg Nesterov
2010-11-08 14:57 ` Q: sys_perf_event_open() && PF_EXITING Oleg Nesterov
2011-01-19 18:21 ` [PATCH 0/2] Was: " Oleg Nesterov
2011-01-19 18:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] perf: fix find_get_context() vs perf_event_exit_task() race Oleg Nesterov
2011-01-19 18:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-19 19:18 ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf: Fix " tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2011-01-21 15:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-01-21 15:53 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-01-21 17:45 ` [PATCH] perf: perf_event_exit_task_context: s/rcu_dereference/rcu_dereference_raw/ Oleg Nesterov
2011-01-21 17:53 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-01-21 21:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-01-24 11:51 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-01-21 22:12 ` [tip:perf/urgent] " tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2011-01-19 18:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] perf: fix perf_event_init_task()/perf_event_free_task() interaction Oleg Nesterov
2011-01-19 18:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-19 19:19 ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf: Fix " tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2011-01-20 19:30 ` Q: perf_install_in_context/perf_event_enable are racy? Oleg Nesterov
2011-01-21 12:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-21 13:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-01-21 13:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-21 14:26 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-01-21 15:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-21 20:40 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-01-24 11:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-01-26 17:53 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-01-26 18:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-01-26 18:51 ` [PATCH] fix the theoretical task_cpu/task_curr problem in kick_process/task_oncpu_function_call Oleg Nesterov
2011-01-26 19:05 ` Q: perf_install_in_context/perf_event_enable are racy? Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-26 19:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-26 19:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-26 21:19 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-01-26 21:33 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-01-27 10:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-27 12:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-27 16:10 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-01-27 16:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-27 16:59 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-01-27 15:52 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-01-27 13:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-27 14:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-27 14:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-27 16:57 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-01-27 17:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-27 22:18 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-01-28 11:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-28 14:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-28 16:28 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-01-28 18:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-31 17:26 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-01-31 18:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-31 19:11 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-01-31 19:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-01 14:03 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2011-02-01 17:27 ` [PATCH] perf: Cure task_oncpu_function_call() races Oleg Nesterov
2011-02-01 18:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-01 18:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-01 21:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-08 14:57 ` Q: perf_event && event->owner Oleg Nesterov
2010-11-08 20:11 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-11-08 20:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-09 16:18 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-11-09 15:57 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-11-09 16:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-09 16:58 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-11-09 17:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-09 17:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-11-09 18:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-09 18:57 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-11-09 19:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-10 15:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-10 15:44 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-11-12 15:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-12 18:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-11-18 14:09 ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf: Fix owner-list vs exit tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-08 18:41 ` Q: perf_event && task->ptrace_bps[] Frederic Weisbecker
2010-11-08 19:18 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-01-17 23:58 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-01-18 1:16 ` Roland McGrath
2011-01-17 20:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-01-17 20:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-01-17 21:01 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-01-18 16:09 ` [PATCH 0/2] perf: event->cpu checking fixes Oleg Nesterov
2011-01-18 16:10 ` [PATCH 1/2] perf: find_get_context: fix the per-cpu-counter check Oleg Nesterov
2011-01-18 19:06 ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf: Find_get_context: " tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2011-01-18 16:10 ` [PATCH 2/2] perf: validate cpu early in perf_event_alloc() Oleg Nesterov
2011-01-18 19:07 ` [tip:perf/urgent] perf: Validate " tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2011-01-18 18:42 ` Q: perf_event && task->ptrace_bps[] Frederic Weisbecker
2011-01-19 15:37 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-01-19 20:05 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-01-20 17:28 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-01-28 17:41 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1296569037.26581.194.camel@laptop \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.