From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
To: Anatolij Gustschin <agust@denx.de>,
Holger Brunck <holger.brunck@keymile.com>,
Norbert van Bolhuis <nvbolhuis@aimvalley.nl>
Cc: "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4/7] UBIFS: use max_write_size for write-buffers
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 10:21:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1296634917-19335-5-git-send-email-dedekind1@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1296634917-19335-1-git-send-email-dedekind1@gmail.com>
From: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
Switch write-buffers from 'c->min_io_size' to 'c->max_write_size' which
presumably has to be more write speed-efficient. However, when write-buffer
is synchronized, write only the the min. I/O units which contain the
data, do not write whole write-buffer. This is more space-efficient.
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
---
fs/ubifs/io.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ubifs/io.c b/fs/ubifs/io.c
index 7c2a014..37866b6 100644
--- a/fs/ubifs/io.c
+++ b/fs/ubifs/io.c
@@ -351,7 +351,7 @@ static void cancel_wbuf_timer_nolock(struct ubifs_wbuf *wbuf)
int ubifs_wbuf_sync_nolock(struct ubifs_wbuf *wbuf)
{
struct ubifs_info *c = wbuf->c;
- int err, dirt;
+ int err, dirt, sync_len;
cancel_wbuf_timer_nolock(wbuf);
if (!wbuf->used || wbuf->lnum == -1)
@@ -370,22 +370,29 @@ int ubifs_wbuf_sync_nolock(struct ubifs_wbuf *wbuf)
if (c->ro_error)
return -EROFS;
- ubifs_pad(c, wbuf->buf + wbuf->used, wbuf->avail);
+ /*
+ * Do not write whole write buffer but write only the minimum necessary
+ * amount of min. I/O units.
+ */
+ sync_len = ALIGN(wbuf->used, c->min_io_size);
+ dirt = sync_len - wbuf->used;
+ if (dirt)
+ ubifs_pad(c, wbuf->buf + wbuf->used, dirt);
err = ubi_leb_write(c->ubi, wbuf->lnum, wbuf->buf, wbuf->offs,
- wbuf->size, wbuf->dtype);
+ sync_len, wbuf->dtype);
if (err) {
ubifs_err("cannot write %d bytes to LEB %d:%d",
- wbuf->size, wbuf->lnum, wbuf->offs);
+ sync_len, wbuf->lnum, wbuf->offs);
dbg_dump_stack();
return err;
}
- dirt = wbuf->avail;
-
spin_lock(&wbuf->lock);
- wbuf->offs += wbuf->size;
- wbuf->avail = c->min_io_size;
- wbuf->size = c->min_io_size;
+ wbuf->offs += sync_len;
+ wbuf->size = c->leb_size - wbuf->offs;
+ if (wbuf->size > c->max_write_size)
+ wbuf->size = c->max_write_size;
+ wbuf->avail = wbuf->size;
wbuf->used = 0;
wbuf->next_ino = 0;
spin_unlock(&wbuf->lock);
@@ -428,8 +435,10 @@ int ubifs_wbuf_seek_nolock(struct ubifs_wbuf *wbuf, int lnum, int offs,
spin_lock(&wbuf->lock);
wbuf->lnum = lnum;
wbuf->offs = offs;
- wbuf->avail = c->min_io_size;
- wbuf->size = c->min_io_size;
+ wbuf->size = c->leb_size - wbuf->offs;
+ if (wbuf->size > c->max_write_size)
+ wbuf->size = c->max_write_size;
+ wbuf->avail = wbuf->size;
wbuf->used = 0;
spin_unlock(&wbuf->lock);
wbuf->dtype = dtype;
@@ -561,9 +570,11 @@ int ubifs_wbuf_write_nolock(struct ubifs_wbuf *wbuf, void *buf, int len)
goto out;
spin_lock(&wbuf->lock);
- wbuf->offs += c->min_io_size;
- wbuf->avail = c->min_io_size;
- wbuf->size = c->min_io_size;
+ wbuf->offs += wbuf->size;
+ wbuf->size = c->leb_size - wbuf->offs;
+ if (wbuf->size > c->max_write_size)
+ wbuf->size = c->max_write_size;
+ wbuf->avail = wbuf->size;
wbuf->used = 0;
wbuf->next_ino = 0;
spin_unlock(&wbuf->lock);
@@ -601,9 +612,9 @@ int ubifs_wbuf_write_nolock(struct ubifs_wbuf *wbuf, void *buf, int len)
* We align node length to 8-byte boundary because we anyway flash wbuf
* if the remaining space is less than 8 bytes.
*/
- n = aligned_len >> c->min_io_shift;
+ n = aligned_len >> c->max_write_shift;
if (n) {
- n <<= c->min_io_shift;
+ n <<= c->max_write_shift;
dbg_io("write %d bytes to LEB %d:%d", n, wbuf->lnum, offs);
err = ubi_leb_write(c->ubi, wbuf->lnum, buf + written, offs, n,
wbuf->dtype);
@@ -626,8 +637,10 @@ int ubifs_wbuf_write_nolock(struct ubifs_wbuf *wbuf, void *buf, int len)
wbuf->offs = offs;
wbuf->used = aligned_len;
- wbuf->avail = c->min_io_size - aligned_len;
- wbuf->size = c->min_io_size;
+ wbuf->size = c->leb_size - wbuf->offs;
+ if (wbuf->size > c->max_write_size)
+ wbuf->size = c->max_write_size;
+ wbuf->avail = wbuf->size - aligned_len;
wbuf->next_ino = 0;
spin_unlock(&wbuf->lock);
@@ -851,11 +864,11 @@ int ubifs_wbuf_init(struct ubifs_info *c, struct ubifs_wbuf *wbuf)
{
size_t size;
- wbuf->buf = kmalloc(c->min_io_size, GFP_KERNEL);
+ wbuf->buf = kmalloc(c->max_write_size, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!wbuf->buf)
return -ENOMEM;
- size = (c->min_io_size / UBIFS_CH_SZ + 1) * sizeof(ino_t);
+ size = (c->max_write_size / UBIFS_CH_SZ + 1) * sizeof(ino_t);
wbuf->inodes = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!wbuf->inodes) {
kfree(wbuf->buf);
@@ -865,7 +878,7 @@ int ubifs_wbuf_init(struct ubifs_info *c, struct ubifs_wbuf *wbuf)
wbuf->used = 0;
wbuf->lnum = wbuf->offs = -1;
- wbuf->avail = wbuf->size = c->min_io_size;
+ wbuf->avail = wbuf->size = c->max_write_size;
wbuf->dtype = UBI_UNKNOWN;
wbuf->sync_callback = NULL;
mutex_init(&wbuf->io_mutex);
--
1.7.2.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-02 8:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-02 8:21 [PATCH 0/7] UBIFS: fix recovery on CFI NOR Artem Bityutskiy
2011-02-02 8:21 ` [PATCH 1/7] UBI: incorporate maximum write size Artem Bityutskiy
2011-02-02 8:21 ` [PATCH 2/7] UBIFS: " Artem Bityutskiy
2011-02-02 8:21 ` [PATCH 3/7] UBIFS: introduce write-buffer size field Artem Bityutskiy
2011-02-02 8:21 ` Artem Bityutskiy [this message]
2011-02-02 8:21 ` [PATCH 6/7] UBIFS: amend commentaries in io.c to match new situation Artem Bityutskiy
2011-02-02 8:21 ` [PATCH 7/7] UBIFS: use max_write_size during recovery Artem Bityutskiy
2011-02-02 12:48 ` [PATCH 0/7] UBIFS: fix recovery on CFI NOR Anatolij Gustschin
2011-02-02 15:21 ` Holger Brunck
2011-02-02 17:16 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-02-03 9:01 ` Holger Brunck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1296634917-19335-5-git-send-email-dedekind1@gmail.com \
--to=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=agust@denx.de \
--cc=holger.brunck@keymile.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=nvbolhuis@aimvalley.nl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.