From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
To: ofono@ofono.org
Subject: Re: Selecting multiple radio access technologies in oFono
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 11:44:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1296643483.1520.319.camel@aeonflux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=4tkd9Oe2+jhJdRjShX0VPYG=YsXysu=hSHiRo@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1798 bytes --]
Hi Sjur,
> >> > The current API has 'gsm', 'umts', 'lte' and 'any'. I think you are
> >> > suggesting something like 'all-but-lte', right?
> >> I think it would be nice if user could be able to select multiple
> >> preferred bands, not just only one. The use case I came up with was
> >> this 'all-but-lte'.
> >
> > can we first be clear that we are talking about technology selection and
> > not band selection. They are different.
> >
> > Right now I have no idea on how the hardware will ever support this
> > properly.
>
> FYI, as far as I know the STE will supports the following technology
> combinations:
> - GSM only (WCDMA/E-UTRAN off)
> - WCDMA only (GSM/E-UTRAN off)
> - GSM +WCDMA (E-UTRAN off)
> - E-UTRAN only (GSM/WCDMA off)
> - E-UTRAN+GSM (WCDMA off)
> - E-UTRAN+WCDMA (GSM off)
>
> *If* we want to expose this kind of granularity on the oFono API,
> we should probably go with Remi's proposal with a boolean for each
> technology.
right now I prefer to keep it simple.
We also have to think about the CDMA+LTE combination and CDMA+GSM combo
chips. There is still a bit a uncertainty how these are going to look
like. And more important how we have to expose them.
> > RAT selection is already so different that I prefer to keep it
> > like this. It is simple. We can cross the LTE bridge once this becomes a
> > real problem.
>
> If you want to keep it simple it's fine with me. But personally I
> agree with Paavo
> it could be useful to be able to set the radio in "all-but-lte" mode...
Couldn't this be achieved by actual band selection if you really really
wanted this? Do we actually have different LTE band at all. I am still
not all that familiar with the low-level radio technology behind LTE.
Regards
Marcel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-02 10:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-31 13:59 Selecting multiple radio access technologies in oFono Paavo Leinonen
2011-01-31 14:08 ` =?unknown-8bit?q?R=C3=A9mi?= Denis-Courmont
2011-02-01 20:25 ` Aki Niemi
2011-02-02 9:33 ` Paavo Leinonen
2011-02-02 9:42 ` Marcel Holtmann
2011-02-02 10:05 ` =?unknown-8bit?q?R=C3=A9mi?= Denis-Courmont
2011-02-02 10:31 ` Sjur =?unknown-8bit?q?Br=C3=A6ndeland?=
2011-02-02 10:44 ` Marcel Holtmann [this message]
2011-02-02 12:00 ` Kjetil ASDAL
2011-02-02 12:46 ` Lucas De Marchi
2011-02-02 13:10 ` Kjetil ASDAL
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1296643483.1520.319.camel@aeonflux \
--to=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=ofono@ofono.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.