From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (dan.rpsys.net [93.97.175.187]) by mx1.pokylinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46BDD4C8008C for ; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 05:18:21 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.2/8.14.2/Debian-2build1) with ESMTP id p12BKMOS001666; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 11:20:23 GMT X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at dan.rpsys.net Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id egKyNZFEPNGj; Wed, 2 Feb 2011 11:20:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.1.42] (tim [93.97.173.237]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.2/8.14.2/Debian-2build1) with ESMTP id p12BKG66001662 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 2 Feb 2011 11:20:18 GMT From: Richard Purdie To: Wolfgang Denk In-Reply-To: <20110202070331.CA6FBEA65FA@gemini.denx.de> References: <9AFCD584B0B67B48AE8D8585BE30BA9506BAAFDF@orsmsx504.amr.corp.intel.com> <1296382406.13501.7899.camel@rex> <625BA99ED14B2D499DC4E29D8138F1504E6294E1D3@shsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com> <1296492009.13501.13668.camel@rex> <9AFCD584B0B67B48AE8D8585BE30BA9506C267B0@orsmsx504.amr.corp.intel.com> <1296561316.13501.18767.camel@rex> <9AFCD584B0B67B48AE8D8585BE30BA950D73A848@orsmsx504.amr.corp.intel.com> <1296567139.13501.19158.camel@rex> <20110201192705.2546DB187@gemini.denx.de> <1296602979.13501.21658.camel@rex> <20110202070331.CA6FBEA65FA@gemini.denx.de> Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 11:18:04 +0000 Message-ID: <1296645484.1544.2556.camel@rex> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Cc: "poky@yoctoproject.org" Subject: Re: poky-image-sato-sdk failed at do_rootfs X-BeenThere: poky@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Poky build system developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 11:18:22 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 08:03 +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Richard, > > In message <1296602979.13501.21658.camel@rex> you wrote: > > > > Did you leave NO32LIBS set in local.conf as per the default? > > Good point - sorry, I had forgotten about that. I always comment out > NO32LIBS because when building the SDK I also need this for 32 bit > machines. This option really just controls psuedo-native, it has no effect on the SDK which is controlled by SDKMACHINE? Cheers, Richard