From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (dan.rpsys.net [93.97.175.187]) by mx1.pokylinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 815F94C800A3 for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 05:22:25 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.2/8.14.2/Debian-2build1) with ESMTP id p13BOQOm020856; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 11:24:27 GMT X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at dan.rpsys.net Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 5DkRYZBLzW67; Thu, 3 Feb 2011 11:24:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.1.42] (tim [93.97.173.237]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.2/8.14.2/Debian-2build1) with ESMTP id p13BOJq6020839 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 3 Feb 2011 11:24:21 GMT From: Richard Purdie To: Mark Hatle In-Reply-To: <1296656936.1544.3387.camel@rex> References: <1296520080.13501.15996.camel@rex> <1296520850.13501.16052.camel@rex> <4D476541.7040703@windriver.com> <1296558321.13501.18568.camel@rex> <4D4828F0.9020203@windriver.com> <1296656936.1544.3387.camel@rex> Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 11:22:03 +0000 Message-ID: <1296732123.1544.8429.camel@rex> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Cc: poky Subject: Re: Quick hack for profiling tasks X-BeenThere: poky@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Poky build system developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 11:22:26 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 14:28 +0000, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 09:38 -0600, Mark Hatle wrote: > > I'm still used to the RPM world where locales are included in the main package > > and "tagged" so they will or won't be included automatically. I forget they are > > separated out in Poky by default. > > > > So skipping them makes sense to me... > > Some further numbers to backup my comments: > > "time bitbake poky-image-sato -k" > > Before patch: > > real 129m40.482s > user 480m16.520s > sys 66m9.170s > > After patch: > > real 117m7.704s > user 455m40.330s > sys 55m1.390s and just for reference, with the recent fetcher improvements: real 113m39.607s user 458m25.570s sys 55m15.250s I'm doubting the accuracy of the user figure there but the build should be faster overall due to less taring/untaring of tarballs and it looks like it is. It would be possible to really show an improvement by specifically profiling the kernel/linux-libc-headers recipes. Cheers, Richard