All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Beverley <andy@andybev.com>
To: wilson@optimumwireless.com
Cc: netfilter@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: How can I test my tc script?
Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2011 17:02:09 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1297011729.1613.50.camel@andybev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1297010113.3928.12.camel@debian-laptop.OptimumWireless>

On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 12:35 -0400, Optimum Wireless Services wrote:
> > 
> > I think that you should forget the per-user stuff as per my other email
> > and classify traffic. Just my personal opinion - I'd be interested to
> > hear what others think.
> 
> I just need a way that would allow users to experience a reliable
> connection that would always be 15% +- the contracted bandwidth.
> 

You could buy some more upstream bandwidth ;-)

Have you tried the scripts that Marek posted? That's your answer to
limit per user.

> This turned to be more complicated than what I first thought. 
> 
> After adding the new ruleset, I added this little script to try to
> prioritize some traffic, just installed it so, don't know yet how would
> traffic behave:

<snip>

Herein lies your problem. If you want to prioritise traffic *and* limit
per user, then it starts to get complicated. The rules that you posted
will indeed rate limit different types of traffic, but you would need to
do these in conjunction with your other HTB rules for the different
users.

So you would need separate classes for users and traffic type. They'd
have to be parents/children of each other, but which way round and how
you would do it I do not know.

All I'm saying is that you need to take this one step at a time. Getting
a magic solution that does everything is not going to happen straight
away (unless somebody tells me otherwise).

So, try the per user stuff on its own first. Maybe try the traffic
prioritisation on its own as well. Check the results and take it from
there.

BTW - I don't think the traffic prioritisation scripts you posted will
have much affect anyway: they are only really looking at DNS lookups and
SSH, which isn't going to solve your problems.

Andy



  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-06 17:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-03  2:17 How can I test my tc script? Optimum Wireless Services
2011-02-03 11:01 ` Marek Kierdelewicz
2011-02-03 14:13   ` Optimum Wireless Services
2011-02-03 15:06     ` Marek Kierdelewicz
2011-02-03 16:18   ` Optimum Wireless Services
2011-02-04 13:45   ` Optimum Wireless Services
2011-02-04 16:49     ` Optimum Wireless Services
2011-02-04 19:57       ` Optimum Wireless Services
2011-02-05 12:29         ` Andrew Beverley
2011-02-05 19:32         ` Marek Kierdelewicz
2011-02-05 19:29       ` Marek Kierdelewicz
2011-02-05 20:21     ` Marek Kierdelewicz
2011-02-06  0:05       ` Marek Kierdelewicz
2011-02-06  2:24         ` Optimum Wireless Services
2011-02-04 14:22   ` Michele Petrazzo - Unipex
2011-02-05  2:08     ` Andrew Beverley
2011-02-05 14:58     ` Marek Kierdelewicz
2011-02-05 16:37       ` Andrew Beverley
2011-02-05 16:48         ` good tutorial J Webster
2011-02-05 19:22           ` Andrew Beverley
2011-02-05 19:33             ` J Webster
2011-02-05 19:51               ` Bob Miller
2011-02-05 22:47                 ` Andrew Beverley
2011-02-05 22:44               ` Andrew Beverley
2011-02-05 17:04         ` How can I test my tc script? Marek Kierdelewicz
2011-02-06  2:12         ` Optimum Wireless Services
2011-02-06 16:13           ` Andrew Beverley
2011-02-07  8:20       ` Michele Petrazzo - Unipex
2011-02-03 19:38 ` Andrew Beverley
2011-02-05  2:44   ` Optimum Wireless Services
2011-02-05  6:07     ` Optimum Wireless Services
2011-02-05 12:27       ` Andrew Beverley
2011-02-06  2:14         ` Optimum Wireless Services
2011-02-06 16:15           ` Andrew Beverley
2011-02-06 16:35             ` Optimum Wireless Services
2011-02-06 17:02               ` Andrew Beverley [this message]
2011-02-06 23:27                 ` Optimum Wireless Services
2011-02-08  0:56                   ` Andrew Beverley
2011-02-08  2:11                     ` Optimum Wireless Services
2011-02-08  6:52                       ` Andrew Beverley
2011-02-08  2:20                     ` Optimum Wireless Services
2011-02-08  6:53                       ` Andrew Beverley
2011-02-06 16:44             ` Marek Kierdelewicz
2011-02-06 23:31               ` Optimum Wireless Services
2011-02-08  0:58                 ` Andrew Beverley
2011-02-05 12:35     ` Andrew Beverley
2011-02-06  2:17       ` Optimum Wireless Services
2011-02-06 15:54         ` Andrew Beverley
2011-02-06 16:28           ` Optimum Wireless Services
2011-02-06 17:11             ` Andrew Beverley
2011-02-06 23:33               ` Optimum Wireless Services
2011-02-08  1:01                 ` Andrew Beverley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1297011729.1613.50.camel@andybev \
    --to=andy@andybev.com \
    --cc=netfilter@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wilson@optimumwireless.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.