All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com,
	Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>,
	agraf@suse.de, stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] e1000: clear EOP for multi-buffer descriptors
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 08:37:15 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1297093035.3518.5.camel@x201> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110207123026.GA18830@redhat.com>

On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 14:30 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> The e1000 spec says: if software statically allocates
> buffers, and uses memory read to check for completed descriptors, it
> simply has to zero the status byte in the descriptor to make it ready
> for reuse by hardware. This is not a hardware requirement (moving the
> hardware tail pointer is), but is necessary for performing an in–memory
> scan.
> 
> Thus the guest does not have to clear the status byte.  In case it
> doesn't we need to clear EOP for all descriptors
> except the last.  While I don't know of any such guests,
> it's probably a good idea to stick to the spec.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> Reported-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
> 
> ---
>  hw/e1000.c |    3 +++
>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/e1000.c b/hw/e1000.c
> index 3427ff3..7853c12 100644
> --- a/hw/e1000.c
> +++ b/hw/e1000.c
> @@ -694,6 +694,9 @@ e1000_receive(VLANClientState *nc, const uint8_t *buf, size_t size)
>                  desc.length = cpu_to_le16(desc_size + fcs_len(s));
>                  desc.status |= E1000_RXD_STAT_EOP | E1000_RXD_STAT_IXSM;
>              } else {
> +                /* Guest zeroing out status is not a hardware requirement.
> +                   Clear EOP in case guest didn't do it. */
> +                desc.status &= ~E1000_RXD_STAT_EOP;
>                  desc.length = cpu_to_le16(desc_size);
>              }
>          } else { // as per intel docs; skip descriptors with null buf addr

Acked-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-02-07 15:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-07 12:30 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] e1000: clear EOP for multi-buffer descriptors Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-02-07 12:32 ` [Qemu-devel] " Juan Quintela
2011-02-07 13:36 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-02-07 15:37 ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2011-02-07 17:59 ` Alex Williamson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1297093035.3518.5.camel@x201 \
    --to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com \
    --cc=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=quintela@redhat.com \
    --cc=stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.