From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Beverley <andy@andybev.com>
Subject: Re: How can I test my tc script?
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 00:56:17 +0000
Message-ID: <1297126577.1742.34.camel@andybev>
References: <1296699466.4606.14.camel@debian-laptop.OptimumWireless>
	 <1296761916.7587.29.camel@andybev>
	 <1296873898.3644.4.camel@debian-laptop.OptimumWireless>
	 <1296886030.4568.6.camel@debian-laptop.OptimumWireless>
	 <1296908825.1695.8.camel@andybev>
	 <1296958497.3695.18.camel@debian-laptop.OptimumWireless>
	 <1297008953.1613.24.camel@andybev>
	 <1297010113.3928.12.camel@debian-laptop.OptimumWireless>
	 <1297011729.1613.50.camel@andybev>
	 <1297034845.3928.23.camel@debian-laptop.OptimumWireless>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=andybev.com;
	s=selector1; t=1297126587; bh=n9Ro0FvKyOZT6NF3axU3oR1uS8VTCB0HOvSQt
	xBScwg=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:
	 Date:Message-ID:Mime-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=jPrnUPXa
	GzYgb1heBzko6oamcH0nSAXs6XFHSQiVXiOoyWFfr/ePRWM377z7DWy3hNAboc4AJIB
	t54XvwOQHLL3jKvmZokQCvXaljQjtaaeKZKTg+CtsCJZcXUVbex9PnNUHqOzNkH+lcT
	6E9uPjKhx22LYYapy7R5TXPD2FZ+c=
In-Reply-To: <1297034845.3928.23.camel@debian-laptop.OptimumWireless>
Sender: netfilter-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netfilter.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: wilson@optimumwireless.com
Cc: netfilter@vger.kernel.org

On Sun, 2011-02-06 at 19:27 -0400, Optimum Wireless Services wrote:
> I just added those prioritising rules so, I will be removing them
> immediately. Is hard to really notice how the ruleset are working since
> there isn't an utility that can graph or show the actual traffic. I was
> looking for tc-viewer but, can't find a link where to download it from.

http://files.andybev.com/web-portal/tc-viewer

tc-viewer --iface=eth0 --zero --counter=1 --unit=kbit

> > So you would need separate classes for users and traffic type. They'd
> > have to be parents/children of each other, but which way round and how
> > you would do it I do not know.
> > 
> 
> I figured I added the prio rules to the same parent rule I already had.
> Thought that was the correct way to do it. So, I should create another
> parent rule for ie; 3, and add the children under that to do traffic
> prioritizing.

Something like that, but you'll have problems sharing traffic between
the different classes (classes for different IP addresses and traffic
for different priorities). That's why I say that I don't know how to do
it myself.

> > So, try the per user stuff on its own first. Maybe try the traffic
> > prioritisation on its own as well. Check the results and take it from
> > there.
> > 
> > BTW - I don't think the traffic prioritisation scripts you posted will
> > have much affect anyway: they are only really looking at DNS lookups and
> > SSH, which isn't going to solve your problems.
> > 
> 
> I wanted to speed up dns lookups, icmps, SYN ACK flags, and ssh, for now
> and later on add voip since I have an asterisk server on our network as
> well.
> 
> I will remove the prioritising script and leave the last created ruleset
> and see how things behave.

If you give me a few days I'll send you through my traffic
prioritisation script. It won't give you the per-user limit, but I can
almost guarantee that it will give everyone faster access, so you can at
least use it for a comparison to see what is possible.

Andy