Re: Wrong network

[Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>]

On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 07:40 -0500, Steve Thompson wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Feb 2011, Ian Kent wrote:
> 
> > Fair call, but it comes over as though you don't want to contribute at
> > all, which isn't good.
> 
> That's not the impression I meant to give at all. I _am_ building some new 
> test machines (about ten of them), and I _will_ do some testing. My test 
> machines will all be 32-bit, though, as there is no spare 64-bit hardware. 
> I just can't go testing on a production network; what with this and the 
> hang problem I described in a separate post, I'm close enough to being 
> lynched as it is. I have written my own applications of a similar level of 
> complexity to autofs, and I certainly appreciate that it's not easy, and I 
> definitely appreciate the job that you're doing.

We're good then.

I appreciate you are in a difficult spot, but spare a thought for the
pressures I may have that tent to make me a bit short from time to
time, ;)

As far as the hang you have seen, I don't know why that's happening, the
patches were added between el5_5.4 and el5_5.6 have been around for
quite a while, upstream and in Fedora and tested by more than one
customer, so I didn't expect to hear of a problem. Like I said, send me
a gdb backtrace so that I can see where it's happening.

Just to confirm, this is autofs-5.0.1-0.rc2.143.el5_5.6, and what kernel
revision, I guess the same as RHEL-5.5, which should be fine.

I can post the previous RedHat package to people.redhat.com so you can
revert back while we work on this, if that will kelp.

Ian