All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
To: Ricard Wanderlof <ricard.wanderlof@axis.com>
Cc: David Peverley <pev@sketchymonkey.com>,
	"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: CONFIG_MTD_NAND_VERIFY_WRITE with Software ECC
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 10:42:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1298623342.2798.9.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1102171013090.2784@lnxricardw.se.axis.com>

On Thu, 2011-02-17 at 11:04 +0100, Ricard Wanderlof wrote:
> Which all goes to say that as Cooke notes in his document above, it is 
> necessary for the software to keep track of the number of erase cycles, 
> and not just rely in the erase/write status that the chip itself reports.

Yeah, in UBI we do keep have erase counters, but we do not actually use
them to make decisions about whether to mark a block as good or bad.
Probably we should.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)

  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-25  8:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-15 12:35 CONFIG_MTD_NAND_VERIFY_WRITE with Software ECC David Peverley
2011-02-15 13:02 ` Ricard Wanderlof
2011-02-15 14:00   ` David Peverley
2011-02-15 15:01     ` Ricard Wanderlof
2011-02-15 17:58       ` David Peverley
2011-02-17 10:04         ` Ricard Wanderlof
2011-02-25  8:42           ` Artem Bityutskiy [this message]
2011-02-25  9:09             ` Ricard Wanderlof
2011-02-25 10:29               ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-02-25 11:36                 ` Ivan Djelic
2011-02-25 12:12                   ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-02-25 12:59                     ` David Peverley
2011-02-25 13:21                       ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-02-25 18:27                       ` Ivan Djelic
2011-02-25 14:44                     ` Ivan Djelic
2011-02-25 16:41                       ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-02-25 12:22                   ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-02-25 15:14                     ` Ivan Djelic
2011-02-25  8:31     ` Artem Bityutskiy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1298623342.2798.9.camel@localhost \
    --to=dedekind1@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=pev@sketchymonkey.com \
    --cc=ricard.wanderlof@axis.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.