From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.pbcl.net ([88.198.119.4] helo=hetzner.pbcl.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Pu6gE-0005WL-W7 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 18:14:43 +0100 Received: from cambridge.roku.com ([81.142.160.137] helo=[172.30.1.145]) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pu6eu-0006RN-4e; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 18:13:20 +0100 From: Phil Blundell To: Otavio Salvador In-Reply-To: References: <1298899606-9139-1-git-send-email-otavio@ossystems.com.br> <1298912130.23547.8.camel@phil-desktop> Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 17:18:33 +0000 Message-ID: <1298913513.23547.22.camel@phil-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Cc: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] freerdp: rdpepends on xprop X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 17:14:43 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 17:06 +0000, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 16:55, Phil Blundell wrote: > > On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 13:26 +0000, Otavio Salvador wrote: > >> +RDEPENDS += "xprop" > > > > I'm surprised that recipe_sanity didn't object to that. Is this really > > what you want? > > Why? I failed to see why it is wrong. Mind to clarify? Bare vars like that will apply to all the PACKAGES. That's seldom useful, which is why there is a QA check to detect this sort of thing and print a warning. p.