From: Phil Blundell <philb@gnu.org>
To: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
Cc: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] conf/bitbake.conf: add DISTRO_ARCH and MACHINE_DISTRO_ARCH
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 17:54:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1298915684.23547.28.camel@phil-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=fohQFaxQnTP-VxoNh+P8np9uXCsvChtdT2ORT@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 17:04 +0000, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> We have a set of products that reuse a common distro definition but
> has different needs on a small set of packages. To avoid having them
> all rebuild we set those to DISTRO_ARCH and the ones that depends on
> machine and distro to MACHINE_DISTRO_ARCH avoiding a lot of rebuilding
> and CPU time.
That sounds to me like you're using ${DISTRO} for a purpose that was not
really intended. I do have some sympathy for the scenario you mention
but I'm not convinced that adding these new ARCHS for everyone is the
right answer.
Obviously you're welcome to bash PACKAGE_ARCHS any way you want in your
own DISTRO.conf file and I think that's probably the right place for
this sort of thing rather than putting it in the global bitbake.conf and
causing extra complexity for everyone. Or maybe you could consider
using ${MACHINE}, which is already a PACKAGE_ARCH, to discriminate
between the different packages.
p.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-28 17:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-28 13:26 [PATCH 1/2] freerdp: rdpepends on xprop Otavio Salvador
2011-02-28 13:26 ` [PATCH 2/2] conf/bitbake.conf: add DISTRO_ARCH and MACHINE_DISTRO_ARCH Otavio Salvador
2011-02-28 15:01 ` Koen Kooi
2011-02-28 16:57 ` Phil Blundell
2011-02-28 17:04 ` Otavio Salvador
2011-02-28 17:54 ` Phil Blundell [this message]
2011-02-28 18:00 ` Otavio Salvador
2011-02-28 16:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] freerdp: rdpepends on xprop Phil Blundell
2011-02-28 17:06 ` Otavio Salvador
2011-02-28 17:18 ` Phil Blundell
2011-02-28 17:18 ` Otavio Salvador
2011-02-28 17:28 ` [PATCH 1/3] freerdp: rdepends " Otavio Salvador
2011-02-28 17:57 ` Phil Blundell
2011-02-28 17:58 ` Otavio Salvador
2011-02-28 18:17 ` Phil Blundell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1298915684.23547.28.camel@phil-desktop \
--to=philb@gnu.org \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=otavio@ossystems.com.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.