All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 -tip] perf: x86, add SandyBridge support
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 16:45:41 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1298969141.4937.94.camel@minggr.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=eUnZqT3MF7Y8ONrnGh-7MoZJsefisWFR10p7d@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 15:43 +0800, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 15:22 +0800, Lin Ming wrote:
> >> This patch adds basic SandyBridge support, including hardware cache
> >> events and PEBS events support.
> >>
> >> LLC-* hareware cache events don't work for now, it depends on the
> >> offcore patches.
> >
> > What's the status of those, Stephane reported some problems last I
> > remember?
> >
> I tried the trick I mentioned and it seems to work.
> 
> Something like below with hwc->extra_alloc.
> Could probably find a better name for that field.

Stephane,

I'll integrate below changes to the offcore patches, OK?

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
index f152930..ac1d100 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
@@ -906,7 +906,7 @@ intel_percore_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event)
 	int free_slot;
 	int found;
 
-	if (!x86_pmu.percore_constraints)
+	if (!x86_pmu.percore_constraints || hwc->extra_alloc)
 		return NULL;
 
 	for (c = x86_pmu.percore_constraints; c->cmask; c++) {
@@ -931,6 +931,7 @@ intel_percore_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event)
 				if (hwc->extra_config == era->extra_config) {
 					era->ref++;
 					cpuc->percore_used = 1;
+					hwc->extra_alloc = 1;
 					c = NULL;
 				}
 				/* else conflict */
@@ -945,6 +946,7 @@ intel_percore_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event)
 			era->extra_reg = hwc->extra_reg;
 			era->extra_config = hwc->extra_config;
 			cpuc->percore_used = 1;
+			hwc->extra_alloc = 1;
 			c = NULL;
 		}
 		raw_spin_unlock(&pc->lock);
@@ -998,6 +1000,7 @@ static void intel_put_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc,
 			    era->extra_config == hwc->extra_config &&
 			    era->extra_reg == er->msr) {
 				era->ref--;
+				hwc->extra_alloc = 0;
 				break;
 			}
 		}
diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index f531ce3..dbbf33a 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -546,6 +546,7 @@ struct hw_perf_event {
 			int		last_cpu;
 			unsigned int	extra_reg;
 			u64		extra_config;
+			int		extra_alloc;
 		};
 		struct { /* software */
 			struct hrtimer	hrtimer;


> 
> static struct event_constraint *
> intel_percore_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event)
> {
>         struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
>         unsigned int e = hwc->config & ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_EVENT;
>         struct event_constraint *c;
>         struct intel_percore *pc;
>         struct er_account *era;
>         int i;
>         int free_slot;
>         int found;
> 
>         if (!x86_pmu.percore_constraints)
>                 return NULL;
> 
>         if (hwc->extra_alloc)
>                 return NULL;
> 
>         for (c = x86_pmu.percore_constraints; c->cmask; c++) {
>                 if (e != c->code)
>                         continue;
> 
>                 /*
>                  * Allocate resource per core.
>                  */
>                 c = NULL;
>                 pc = cpuc->per_core;
>                 if (!pc)
>                         break;
>                 c = &emptyconstraint;
>                 raw_spin_lock(&pc->lock);
>                 free_slot = -1;
>                 found = 0;
>                 for (i = 0; i < MAX_EXTRA_REGS; i++) {
>                         era = &pc->regs[i];
>                         if (era->ref > 0 && hwc->extra_reg == era->extra_reg) {
>                                 /* Allow sharing same config */
>                                 if (hwc->extra_config == era->extra_config) {
>                                         era->ref++;
>                                         cpuc->percore_used = 1;
>                                         hwc->extra_alloc = 1;
>                                         c = NULL;
>                                 }
>                                 /* else conflict */
>                                 found = 1;
>                                 break;
>                         } else if (era->ref == 0 && free_slot == -1)
>                                 free_slot = i;
>                 }
>                 if (!found && free_slot != -1) {
>                         era = &pc->regs[free_slot];
>                         era->ref = 1;
>                         era->extra_reg = hwc->extra_reg;
>                         era->extra_config = hwc->extra_config;
>                         cpuc->percore_used = 1;
>                         hwc->extra_alloc = 1;
>                         c = NULL;
>                 }
>                 raw_spin_unlock(&pc->lock);
>                 return c;
>         }
> 
>         return NULL;
> }
> 
> static void intel_put_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc,
>                                         struct perf_event *event)
> {
>         struct extra_reg *er;
>         struct intel_percore *pc;
>         struct er_account *era;
>         struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
>         int i, allref;
> 
>         if (!cpuc->percore_used)
>                 return;
> 
>         for (er = x86_pmu.extra_regs; er->msr; er++) {
>                 if (er->event != (hwc->config & er->config_mask))
>                         continue;
> 
>                 pc = cpuc->per_core;
>                 raw_spin_lock(&pc->lock);
>                 for (i = 0; i < MAX_EXTRA_REGS; i++) {
>                         era = &pc->regs[i];
>                         if (era->ref > 0 &&
>                             era->extra_config == hwc->extra_config &&
>                             era->extra_reg == er->msr) {
>                                 era->ref--;
>                                 hwc->extra_alloc = 0;
>                                 break;
>                         }
>                 }
>                 allref = 0;
>                 for (i = 0; i < MAX_EXTRA_REGS; i++)
>                         allref += pc->regs[i].ref;
>                 if (allref == 0)
>                         cpuc->percore_used = 0;
>                 raw_spin_unlock(&pc->lock);
>                 break;
>         }
> }
> 
> >
> >>  #define INTEL_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(c, n) \
> >>       EVENT_CONSTRAINT(c, n, ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_EVENT)
> >> +#define INTEL_EVENT_CONSTRAINT2(c, n)        \
> >> +     EVENT_CONSTRAINT(c, n, INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK)
> >
> > That's a particularly bad name, how about something like
> >
> > INTEL_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT or somesuch.
> >
> >> @@ -702,7 +738,13 @@ static void intel_ds_init(void)
> >>                       printk(KERN_CONT "PEBS fmt1%c, ", pebs_type);
> >>                       x86_pmu.pebs_record_size = sizeof(struct pebs_record_nhm);
> >>                       x86_pmu.drain_pebs = intel_pmu_drain_pebs_nhm;
> >> -                     x86_pmu.pebs_constraints = intel_nehalem_pebs_events;
> >> +                     switch (boot_cpu_data.x86_model) {
> >> +                     case 42: /* SandyBridge */
> >> +                             x86_pmu.pebs_constraints = intel_snb_pebs_events;
> >> +                             break;
> >> +                     default:
> >> +                             x86_pmu.pebs_constraints = intel_nehalem_pebs_events;
> >> +                     }
> >>                       break;
> >>
> >>               default:
> >
> > We already have this massive model switch right after this function,
> > might as well move the pebs constraint assignment there.
> >



  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-03-01  8:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-28  7:22 [PATCH v2 -tip] perf: x86, add SandyBridge support Lin Ming
2011-02-28  8:20 ` Stephane Eranian
2011-02-28  8:51   ` Lin Ming
2011-02-28  9:02     ` Stephane Eranian
2011-02-28 14:03       ` Lin Ming
2011-02-28 14:28         ` Lin Ming
2011-02-28  9:08     ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-28 14:02       ` Lin Ming
2011-02-28 14:13         ` Stephane Eranian
2011-02-28  9:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-28 12:25   ` Stephane Eranian
2011-02-28 14:33     ` Lin Ming
2011-02-28 14:43       ` Stephane Eranian
2011-02-28 14:52         ` Lin Ming
2011-02-28 14:55           ` Stephane Eranian
2011-02-28 14:21   ` Lin Ming
2011-02-28 14:24     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-28 14:45       ` Lin Ming
2011-02-28 14:46         ` Stephane Eranian
2011-02-28 14:56   ` Lin Ming
2011-02-28 15:11     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-01  0:32       ` Lin Ming
2011-03-01  7:43   ` Stephane Eranian
2011-03-01  8:21     ` Lin Ming
2011-03-01  8:45     ` Lin Ming [this message]
2011-03-01  8:57       ` Stephane Eranian
2011-03-01  9:39         ` Stephane Eranian
2011-03-01 15:07           ` Lin Ming
2011-03-01 15:09             ` Stephane Eranian
2011-03-01 15:18               ` Lin Ming

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1298969141.4937.94.camel@minggr.sh.intel.com \
    --to=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.