From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756793Ab1CBKce (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2011 05:32:34 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:44348 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755687Ab1CBKcc (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Mar 2011 05:32:32 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] perf-events: Add support for supplementary event registers From: Peter Zijlstra To: Stephane Eranian Cc: Lin Ming , Ingo Molnar , Andi Kleen , linux-kernel In-Reply-To: References: <1298998076.2170.62.camel@localhost> <1299026246.4937.99.camel@minggr.sh.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 11:34:01 +0100 Message-ID: <1299062041.1310.3.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 08:48 +0100, Stephane Eranian wrote: > >> > __u32 bp_type; > >> > - __u64 bp_addr; > >> > - __u64 bp_len; > >> > + union { > >> > + __u64 bp_addr; > >> > + __u64 config1; /* extension of config0 */ > >> > + }; > >> > + union { > >> > + __u64 bp_len; > >> > + __u64 config2; /* extension of config1 */ > >> > + }; > >> > }; > >> > > >> I don't see where those config0 or config1 are coming from. > > > > config0 means perf_event_attr::config. > > > yes. > > > Peter suggested to extend the attr config space. > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=129838808907525&w=2 > > > Ok, I get it, it is cascading. that's fine. I initially put config and config0 in a union, but that made compilation fail and fixing that up vs the benefit of actually having a config0, which seemed near 0, led me to drop that part. Forgot to update the comment though ;-)