All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>,
	"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Nadolski, Edmund" <edmund.nadolski@intel.com>,
	"Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
	"Skirvin, Jeffrey D" <jeffrey.d.skirvin@intel.com>,
	"Danecki, Jacek" <jacek.danecki@intel.com>
Subject: Re: Should isci create its own device class?
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 10:38:45 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1299091125.11010.4.camel@dwillia2-linux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1299070146.604.3.camel@mulgrave.site>

On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 04:49 -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 19:22 -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> > For compatibility with other software raid environments an isci [1] 
> > device may contain up to two controller instances per pci device.
> 
> So every other SCSI card I've seen that's done this, the multiple
> controllers have been different PCI functions, and thus distinguishable
> at the PCI level ... why is isci different?
> 

The existence of multiple SAS controllers is hidden behind a single
"RAID controller" in environments where software RAID is "request" based
and cannot span controllers with a single driver instance.  Linux
software RAID in contrast is bio based and controller spanning happens
naturally.

> > Currently the sysfs path for its scsi_host objects is:
> > > ../../devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:01.0/0000:01:00.0/0000:02:08.0/0000:03:00.0/host10/scsi_host/host10
> > > ../../devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:01.0/0000:01:00.0/0000:02:08.0/0000:03:00.0/host11/scsi_host/host11
> > 
> > But to reflect reality the pci device is actually the parent of two 
> > independent controller instances.  With a mockup like:
> > > ../../devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:01.0/0000:01:00.0/0000:02:08.0/0000:03:00.0/controller0/host10/scsi_host/host10
> > > ../../devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:01.0/0000:01:00.0/0000:02:08.0/0000:03:00.0/controller1/host11/scsi_host/host11
> > 
> > I can see this being beneficial in a few ways:
> > 
> > 1/ fix dev_printk() messages which right now give an ambiguous "isci 
> > 0000:03:00.0" prefix
> > 2/ controller boundaries are visible via the sysfs path without need to 
> > to look at sas_addresses to determine the controller.
> > 2/ if we ever wanted to support some per controller attributes between 
> > the global pci attributes and the scsi_host attributes.
> 
> So what's wrong with just using the hostX for this instead of inventing
> a new dummy level in the tree?
> 

Ok, I'm primarily concerned with userspace being able to map physical
connectors back to sas_phy objects.  I think an "isci_id" file at the
hostX level would be sufficient, and cleaner in the case of single
controller isci instances.  It does not address the dev_printk() nit,
but that is easy enough to workaround.  Is the following acceptable?

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/isci/init.c b/drivers/scsi/isci/init.c
index 124f4c7..5f46124 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/isci/init.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/isci/init.c
@@ -237,12 +237,28 @@ static int isci_register_sas_ha(struct isci_host *isci_host)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static void isci_unregister_sas_ha(struct isci_host *isci_host)
+static ssize_t isci_show_id(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
 {
+	struct Scsi_Host *shost = container_of(dev, typeof(*shost), shost_dev);
+	struct sas_ha_struct *sas_ha = SHOST_TO_SAS_HA(shost);
+	struct isci_host *ihost = container_of(sas_ha, typeof(*ihost), sas_ha);
+
+	return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%d\n", ihost->id);
+}
+
+static DEVICE_ATTR(isci_id, S_IRUGO, isci_show_id, NULL);
+
+static void isci_unregister(struct isci_host *isci_host)
+{
+	struct Scsi_Host *shost;
+
 	if (!isci_host)
 		return;
 
-	sas_unregister_ha(&(isci_host->sas_ha));
+	shost = isci_host->shost;
+	device_remove_file(&shost->shost_dev, &dev_attr_isci_id);
+
+	sas_unregister_ha(&isci_host->sas_ha);
 
 	sas_remove_host(isci_host->shost);
 	scsi_remove_host(isci_host->shost);
@@ -413,8 +429,14 @@ static struct isci_host *isci_host_alloc(struct pci_dev *pdev, int id)
 	if (err)
 		goto err_shost_remove;
 
+	err = device_create_file(&shost->shost_dev, &dev_attr_isci_id);
+	if (err)
+		goto err_unregister_ha;
+
 	return isci_host;
 
+ err_unregister_ha:
+	sas_unregister_ha(&(isci_host->sas_ha));
  err_shost_remove:
 	scsi_remove_host(shost);
  err_shost:
@@ -516,7 +538,7 @@ static int __devinit isci_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_devic
 
  err_host_alloc:
 	for_each_isci_host(isci_host, pdev)
-		isci_unregister_sas_ha(isci_host);
+		isci_unregister(isci_host);
 	return err;
 }
 
@@ -525,7 +547,7 @@ static void __devexit isci_pci_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
 	struct isci_host *isci_host;
 
 	for_each_isci_host(isci_host, pdev) {
-		isci_unregister_sas_ha(isci_host);
+		isci_unregister(isci_host);
 		isci_host_deinit(isci_host);
 		scic_controller_disable_interrupts(isci_host->core_controller);
 	}



      reply	other threads:[~2011-03-02 18:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-02  3:22 Should isci create its own device class? Dan Williams
2011-03-02 12:49 ` James Bottomley
2011-03-02 18:38   ` Dan Williams [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1299091125.11010.4.camel@dwillia2-linux \
    --to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@suse.de \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=edmund.nadolski@intel.com \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=jacek.danecki@intel.com \
    --cc=jeffrey.d.skirvin@intel.com \
    --cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.