Re: fcoe: correct checking for bonding

[Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>]

On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 01:55 -0800, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Or perhaps this should be applied to net-next?
> 
I think this should go through scsi-misc as all the other
libfc/libfcoe/fcoe patches do.

> Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 07:05:35AM CET, jpirko@redhat.com wrote:
> >Check for bonding master and refuse to use that.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@redhat.com>
> >---
> > drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c |    4 +---
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c b/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c
> >index 9f9600b..3becc6a 100644
> >--- a/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c
> >+++ b/drivers/scsi/fcoe/fcoe.c
> >@@ -285,9 +285,7 @@ static int fcoe_interface_setup(struct fcoe_interface *fcoe,
> > 	}
> > 
> > 	/* Do not support for bonding device */
> >-	if ((netdev->priv_flags & IFF_MASTER_ALB) ||
> >-	    (netdev->priv_flags & IFF_SLAVE_INACTIVE) ||
> >-	    (netdev->priv_flags & IFF_MASTER_8023AD)) {
> >+	if (netdev->priv_flags & IFF_BONDING && netdev->flags & IFF_MASTER) {
> > 		FCOE_NETDEV_DBG(netdev, "Bonded interfaces not supported\n");
> > 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > 	}
> >-- 
> >1.7.3.4
> >

James, feel free to pick up this patch. I don't have anything in my fcoe
tree right now that it would conflict with. I'll also put it in my tree
and resend if you don't put it into scsi-misc directly.

Acked-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>