From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
Cc: linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
Ed Nadolski <edmund.nadolski@intel.com>,
Ed Ciechanowski <ed.ciechanowski@intel.com>,
Jacek Danecki <jacek.danecki@intel.com>,
Jeff Skirvin <jeffrey.d.skirvin@intel.com>
Subject: isci for 2.6.39?
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:02:37 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1299801757.8641.21.camel@dwillia2-linux> (raw)
James,
Given the impending opening of the 2.6.39 merge window I would like to
discuss the options for merging the isci driver. Review has been
intermittent which is understandable given the size and flux of the
codebase. It has received a good amount of cleanups, but additional
review issues and cleanups are still all too easy to spot. I know you
have expressed reservations about taking scsi drivers through -staging
in the past [1], so I would like to propose an alternative. Merge the
driver into scsi-misc but with a -staging style TODO file that tracks
the review issues. If the TODO file is not addressed by the 2.6.40
window the driver would be moved to -staging. This has the benefit of
keeping the driver under your purview and expected location, but still
have the imminent prospect of being de-staged to ensure the community's
concerns are ultimately addressed. We fully intend to maintain the
current momentum on the driver cleanup effort and be ready in advance of
2.6.40.
As a side note I'm still looking for a disposition for:
"libsas: flush initial device discovery before completing ->scan_finished()" [2]
"libsas: fix/amend device gone notification in sas_deform_port()" [3]
Both have since been: Acked-by: Jack Wang <jack_wang@usish.com>
Thanks,
Dan for the isci driver team
[1]: http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=125536150519905&w=2
[2]: http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=129791077719331&w=2
[3]: http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=129791105419577&w=2
next reply other threads:[~2011-03-11 0:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-11 0:02 Dan Williams [this message]
2011-03-11 0:10 ` isci for 2.6.39? James Bottomley
2011-03-11 0:40 ` Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1299801757.8641.21.camel@dwillia2-linux \
--to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@suse.de \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=ed.ciechanowski@intel.com \
--cc=edmund.nadolski@intel.com \
--cc=jacek.danecki@intel.com \
--cc=jeffrey.d.skirvin@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.