From: "gprizzi@domain.hid" <gprizzi@domain.hid>
To: gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org
Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org
Subject: [Xenomai-help] R: Re: R: Re: error in executing xenomai tests
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 21:01:56 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <12d5cebd852.gprizzi@domain.hid> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3940 bytes --]
Dear Sir,
I find your considerations very useful, unfortunately I am not expert in tuning conventional
operating system with real time patch.
If you can help me I will greatly appreciate your advices.
I run latency test and got the following results:
root@domain.hid# ./latency
== Sampling period: 100 us
== Test mode: periodic user-mode task
== All results in microseconds
warming up...
RTT| 00:00:01 (periodic user-mode task, 100 us period, priority 99)
RTH|----lat min|----lat avg|----lat max|-overrun|---msw|---lat best|--lat worst
RTD| -1.786| 2.224| 19.821| 0| 0| -1.786| 19.821
RTD| -1.796| 2.330| 19.490| 0| 0| -1.796| 19.821
RTD| -1.831| 2.231| 19.495| 0| 0| -1.831| 19.821
RTD| -1.772| 2.291| 19.743| 0| 0| -1.831| 19.821
RTD| -1.473| 2.460| 19.708| 0| 0| -1.831| 19.821
RTD| -1.524| 2.381| 19.717| 0| 0| -1.831| 19.821
RTD| -1.752| 2.338| 19.807| 0| 0| -1.831| 19.821
RTD| -1.893| 2.297| 19.520| 0| 0| -1.893| 19.821
RTD| -2.192| 2.284| 19.549| 0| 0| -2.192| 19.821
RTD| -1.635| 2.327| 19.530| 0| 0| -2.192| 19.821
RTD| -1.416| 2.406| 19.580| 0| 0| -2.192| 19.821
RTD| -1.305| 2.471| 14.930| 0| 0| -2.192| 19.821
RTD| -1.782| 2.409| 14.999| 0| 0| -2.192| 19.821
RTD| -1.774| 2.364| 18.456| 0| 0| -2.192| 19.821
RTD| -1.784| 2.328| 19.914| 0| 0| -2.192| 19.914
RTD| -1.768| 2.293| 19.639| 0| 0| -2.192| 19.914
RTD| -1.777| 2.263| 19.463| 0| 0| -2.192| 19.914
RTD| -1.228| 2.389| 19.923| 0| 0| -2.192| 19.923
RTD| -1.223| 2.405| 19.579| 0| 0| -2.192| 19.923
RTD| -1.778| 2.431| 14.499| 0| 0| -2.192| 19.923
RTD| -1.983| 2.493| 15.335| 0| 0| -2.192| 19.923
Looking at the worst case of a latency of about 20 us with a task at 2 KHz
I can estimate 2*10^-3 * 20 * 10 ^-6 = 40 * 10^-3 sec lost for latency in 1 sec..
In the average case I will have 5*10^-3 sec. lost for latency in 1 sec.
I think that these percentage can be accepted in a robotic position control,
what do you think about these assumption?
Can you suggest me a better way to evaluate the latency with respect of robotic
position control system or can you suggest me some useful articles to read about this topic?
My kernel has the following configuration
CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY=y
# CONFIG_PREEMPT is not set
CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS=y
and I had a look at
https://rt.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Frequently_Asked_Questions
Do you think that setting CONFIG_PREEMT=y instead of
CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY=y
will significantly reduce latency?
Thank you for your kind support.
Gianpaolo Rizzi
----Messaggio originale----
Da: gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org
Data: 5-gen-2011 8.06 PM
A: "gprizzi@domain.hid"<gprizzi@domain.hid>
Cc: <xenomai@xenomai.org>
Ogg: Re: R: Re: [Xenomai-help] error in executing xenomai tests
gprizzi@domain.hid wrote:
> Tank you for your quick and clear replay.
>
> I am going to use xenomai to run OROCOS based control applications.
> The faster frequency of periodic tasks is estimated between 1KHz to 2 KHz.
Well, that is not enough information. If you seriously want to meet some
deadlines, you have to make a few calculations, then see if your system
has sufficient latency, using the "latency" test. But this really is the
job you should be doing.
Note that for 1kHz or 2kHz on x86 platform, preempt_rt latencies may be
worth checking.
--
Gilles.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 7554 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2011-01-06 20:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-06 20:01 gprizzi [this message]
2011-01-06 20:39 ` [Xenomai-help] error in executing xenomai tests Gilles Chanteperdrix
2011-01-06 21:25 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=12d5cebd852.gprizzi@domain.hid \
--to=gprizzi@domain.hid \
--cc=gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org \
--cc=xenomai@xenomai.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.